dbcve.org
Best Salon Management SystemApplication · Mayurik

CVE-2025-6580

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the component Login. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in the Best Salon Management System 1.0 login function allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the Username argument. The lack of proper input sanitization or parameterized queries enables attackers to manipulate database queries, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the application and exposing sensitive data.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the login function to sanitize user input. Validate and sanitize all user inputs before using them in database queries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Best Salon Management SystemApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Best Salon Management System is running
    Check running web processes or inspect web server document roots for files containing 'salon' or 'Mayurik' in the filename or path. Look for directories like /salon, /best-salon, or similar application folders.
    Affected if The application is present and accessible on the system
  2. Confirm the installed version is 1.0
    Locate version information in the application - check for version files, README files, or configuration files within the application directory that may display or contain '1.0' as the version number. Compare against the affected version range.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 (the only affected version)
  3. Locate the login page endpoint
    Access the web application and navigate to the login page. Common paths include /login.php, /index.php, or the root URL of the application. Identify the form submission target.
    Affected if The login page is accessible via web browser or API endpoint
  4. Verify the login form contains a Username parameter
    Inspect the HTML source of the login form or intercept the HTTP request when submitting credentials. Look for an input field named 'username', 'user', or similar that accepts user credentials.
    Affected if A Username input field exists in the login form and submits to the server
  5. Confirm the application processes login without prepared statements
    If access to source code is available, examine the login processing script (commonly login.php or similar) for database query handling. Look for direct string concatenation of the username parameter into SQL queries rather than parameterized queries.
    Affected if The login code uses direct string interpolation in SQL queries with the Username parameter

A user is affected if they are running Best Salon Management System version 1.0 with the login function accessible over the network and the Username parameter is handled without prepared statements.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the login function to sanitize user input. Validate and sanitize all user inputs before using them in database queries.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence
  1. Contact the vendor (SourceCodester) directly to request a security patch for CVE-2025-6580
  2. Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all SQL queries, particularly in the login authentication logic
  3. Audit the login component code and replace string concatenation with secure database query methods
  4. Apply input validation and output encoding on the Username field
  5. As a temporary mitigation, consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to block SQL injection payloads
  6. Restrict network access to the application if possible to reduce attack surface

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Best Salon Management System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,020
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,832.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data