CVE-2025-12495
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAcademy Software Foundation OpenEXR EXR File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Academy Software Foundation OpenEXR. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of EXR files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27946.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Academy Software Foundation OpenEXR during EXR file parsing. The flaw results from insufficient validation of user-supplied data length before copying to a heap buffer, allowing an attacker to overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code via a malicious EXR file requiring user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if OpenEXR is installedRun 'dpkg -l | grep openexr' (Debian/Ubuntu), 'rpm -qa | grep -i openexr' (RHEL/CentOS), or check for the library file (e.g., libOpenEXR.so) in common locations like /usr/lib/Affected if OpenEXR is not found on the system, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Identify the installed OpenEXR versionRun 'openexrversion' if available, or check the package manager: 'dpkg -s libopenexr-dev' (Debian), 'rpm -qi OpenEXR' (RHEL), or inspect the shared library version with 'strings /usr/lib/libOpenEXR.so | grep -i version'Affected if The installed version is less than 3.4.3 (e.g., 3.4.0, 3.3.0, etc.)
-
Verify the EXR parsing functionality is in useSearch for applications or tools that process EXR files (e.g., imagemagick, renderers, graphics software) by checking installed packages with 'dpkg -l' or 'rpm -qa' and reviewing application dependenciesAffected if Software linked against OpenEXR libraries is present and can process untrusted EXR files
If OpenEXR version is below 3.4.3 and applications can parse user-supplied EXR files, the system is vulnerable to heap-based buffer overflow via malicious EXR input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.4.3
Update OpenEXR to the latest version containing the security patch. As a defensive measure, implement validation of chunk/attribute sizes and use safe memory copy functions with explicit bounds checking before copying user-controlled data.
OpenEXR 3.4.3 or later
- Identify all systems, applications, and containers that use OpenEXR library for EXR file processing
- Check current OpenEXR version on each affected system (e.g., dpkg -l | grep openexr, rpm -qa | grep openexr, or library inspection)
- Upgrade OpenEXR to version 3.4.3 or later using your package manager (e.g., apt-get install libopenexr-dev, yum update openexr, or download from https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases)
- For projects linking against OpenEXR statically, rebuild them after upgrading to ensure they use the fixed library version
- Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new version is 3.4.3 or higher
- Test critical EXR file parsing workflows to ensure functionality is maintained
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12495 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12495 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data