CVE-2025-14489
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware Exposed Dangerous Function Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of RealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the SAS Core Service. The issue results from an exposed dangerous function. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27658.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the SAS Core Service of SUPERAntiSpyware. The service exposes a dangerous function that can be called by low-privileged users, allowing them to escalate to SYSTEM context and execute arbitrary code. An attacker must first achieve low-privileged code execution on the target system before exploiting this flaw.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.1280CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SUPERAntiSpyware installationCheck if SUPERAntiSpyware is installed by looking in Program Files\SUPERAntiSpyware\ or checking the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\ for an entry named SUPERAntiSpywareAffected if SUPERAntiSpyware is installed and running on the system
-
Determine installed versionOpen Programs and Features in Control Panel, find SUPERAntiSpyware, and note the version number displayed; alternatively check the version value in the registry uninstall keyAffected if The installed version is lower than 10.0.1280
-
Identify SAS Core ServiceOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for a service related to SAS Core or SUPERAntiSpyware Core; note its status (Running/Stopped) and startup typeAffected if The SAS Core Service exists and is running or set to start automatically
-
Check service binary pathRight-click the SAS Core Service in services.msc, select Properties, and examine the Path to executable field for the service binary locationAffected if The service binary path points to a location within the SUPERAntiSpyware installation directory
-
Verify service permissionsUse icacls or Sysinternals AccessChk to examine the permissions on the SAS Core Service executable and its parent directory, checking if standard users have write or execute accessAffected if Low-privileged users have write access to the service binary or its directory, enabling them to modify the executable
A system is affected if SUPERAntiSpyware is installed with a version lower than 10.0.1280 and the SAS Core Service is present and accessible to low-privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.1280
Apply the vendor patch when available; until then, restrict user access to the system and monitor for any suspicious interaction with the SAS Core Service.
SuperAntiSpyware version 10.0.1280 or later
- 1. Navigate to the official SuperAntiSpyware website or use the application's built-in update feature
- 2. Check for available updates to SuperAntiSpyware Professional or the version installed
- 3. Download and install version 10.0.1280 or later
- 4. Verify the installation was successful by checking the software version in Help > About
- 5. Restart the computer to ensure the SAS Core Service loads the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14489 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14489 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data