CVE-2025-14492
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware Exposed Dangerous Function Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of RealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the SAS Core Service. The issue results from an exposed dangerous function. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27668.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the SUPERAntiSpyware SAS Core Service. The flaw stems from an exposed dangerous function within the service that allows a low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code in the SYSTEM context. An attacker requires the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system as a prerequisite to exploit this vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.1280CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SUPERAntiSpyware installationLook for the program directory at C:\Program Files\SUPERAntiSpyware\ or check Add/Remove Programs for SUPERAntiSpyware entryAffected if SUPERAntiSpyware is installed on the system
-
Identify installed versionCheck the version by viewing the version info of the main executable (usually SUPERAntiSpyware.exe in the install directory) or by querying the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\SUPERAntiSpywareAffected if The installed version is lower than 10.0.1280
-
Confirm SAS Core Service presenceOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'sc query' command and look for a service named 'SAS Core Service' or similarAffected if The SAS Core Service is present and running on the system
-
Check service executable pathRun 'sc qc "SAS Core Service"' (or the actual service name found) to retrieve the executable path configured for the serviceAffected if The service points to a SUPERAntiSpyware executable in a user-writable location
A user is affected if SUPERAntiSpyware version is below 10.0.1280 and the SAS Core Service is installed and running on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.1280
Apply the vendor-supplied patch for SUPERAntiSpyware when released. In the interim, restrict local user access to the SAS Core Service and monitor for any unauthorized service manipulation attempts.
SuperAntiSpyware version 10.0.1280 or later
- 1. Verify the current SuperAntiSpyware version by opening the application and checking About/Help menu, or right-clicking the application in Programs and selecting Properties
- 2. If the installed version is below 10.0.1280, navigate to the official SuperAntiSpyware website to download the latest version
- 3. Download the most recent stable release (version 10.0.1280 or later) from the official vendor site
- 4. Close SuperAntiSpyware if it is currently running
- 5. Run the installer with administrative privileges
- 6. Follow the installation wizard prompts to complete the upgrade
- 7. After installation, verify the new version by checking About to confirm 10.0.1280 or later is installed
- 8. Restart the computer to ensure the SAS Core Service loads the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14492 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data