CVE-2025-14496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware Exposed Dangerous Function Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of RealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the SAS Core Service. The issue results from an exposed dangerous function. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27678.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the SAS Core Service component of RealDefense SUPERAntiSpyware. The flaw stems from an exposed dangerous function that allows a low-privileged attacker to elevate to SYSTEM context and execute arbitrary code. An attacker requires prior low-privileged code execution on the target system to exploit this vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.1280CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SUPERAntiSpyware is installedCheck for the product in Add/Remove Programs (appwiz.cpl) or look for installation directory at C:\Program Files\SUPERAntiSpyware or C:\Program Files (x86)\SUPERAntiSpywareAffected if Product is installed and version is below 10.0.1280
-
Determine installed version numberRight-click the SUPERAntiSpyware executable (usually in the installation folder), select Properties, and check the Details tab for Product Version. Alternatively, check the version in the program's About/Help sectionAffected if Version shown is less than 10.0.1280 (for example, 10.0.xxxx or earlier)
-
Locate SAS Core ServiceOpen Services (services.msc) and look for a service named 'SAS Core Service' or 'SUPERAntiSpyware Service' or similar. Or run 'sc query' from command prompt to list all services and search for 'SAS' or 'SuperAntiSpyware'Affected if The SAS Core Service exists on the system
-
Check SAS Core Service statusIn Services console, right-click the SAS Core Service and select Properties, or run 'sc query [service_name]' to see if it is Running or StoppedAffected if Service is installed and Running (vulnerability requires the service to be active)
-
Review service permissionsRun 'sc sdshow [service_name]' from an elevated command prompt to view the Discretionary Access Control List (DACL). Check if non-admin users have permission to interact with the service (specifically SERVICE_INTERACTIVE_PROCESS or generic execute permissions)Affected if Low-privileged users have permissions to start/stop or interact with the service
You are affected if SUPERAntiSpyware version is below 10.0.1280 AND the SAS Core Service is installed and running on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.1280
Apply the vendor patch when released. Until then, restrict user access to the SAS Core Service and monitor for suspicious service interactions; consider compensating controls such as restricting who can interact with the service.
10.0.1280 or later
- 1. Visit the official SuperAntiSpyware website or use the built-in update mechanism within the application
- 2. Check the current installed version of SuperAntiSpyware (typically found in Help > About)
- 3. Download or update to version 10.0.1280 or later
- 4. Restart the system if required by the update process
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the version number again
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data