CVE-2025-14512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in glib. This vulnerability allows a heap buffer overflow and denial-of-service (DoS) via an integer overflow in GLib's GIO (GLib Input/Output) escape_byte_string() function when processing malicious file or remote filesystem attribute values.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap buffer overflow and DoS vulnerability in GLib's GIO escape_byte_string() function due to an integer overflow when processing malicious file or remote filesystem attribute values. The overflow allows attackers to corrupt heap memory via crafted attribute values.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 10.0< 2.86.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GLib versionRun 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' or 'rpm -q glib2' on RHEL systems to determine the installed GLib versionAffected if version is lower than 2.86.3
-
Check if GIO module is presentVerify the glib2 package includes GIO by checking for gio-unix-2.0.so or gio module files in /usr/lib/ or /usr/lib64/Affected if GIO module files exist and GLib version is below 2.86.3
-
Identify applications using GIO file system functionsReview application dependencies or audit code for usage of g_file_attribute_* functions, particularly g_file_attribute_value_pack() or escape_byte_string() related code pathsAffected if applications process file or remote filesystem attribute values from untrusted sources using GIO functions
-
Check for extended attribute handling in applicationsAudit custom file handling services or remote filesystem clients that process extended attributes via GLib GIO APIsAffected if extended attributes from external or remote sources are processed through GLib's GIO functions without prior validation
A system is affected if it runs GLib version lower than 2.86.3 and has applications or services that use GIO functions to process file or remote filesystem attribute values from potentially untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.86.3
Update GLib to the patched version that fixes the integer overflow in escape_byte_string(). For systems where immediate patching is not possible, consider input validation on filesystem attribute values before passing to GLib functions.
Glib 2.86.3 or later; For RHEL apply latest vendor glib2 errata; For OpenShift 4.0 apply corresponding RHSA
- Check current glib version: rpm -qa | grep glib2 or pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0
- For RHEL systems: run 'dnf check-update' or 'yum check-update' to see available glib updates
- Apply vendor security updates: sudo dnf update glib2 or sudo yum update glib2 (this will install glib >= 2.86.3 or vendor-patched version)
- For OpenShift 4.0: Apply Red Hat security advisory RHSA-XXXX:XXXX for glib (obtain from access.redhat.com) using 'oc adm upgrade' or cluster version operator
- Reboot or restart affected services to load updated glib libraries
- Verify fix: rpm -qa | grep glib2 and confirm version >= 2.86.3
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- gitlab.gnome.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data