CVE-2025-14664
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/view_unit.php. The manipulation of the argument chkId[] leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0 at /admin/view_unit.php allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the chkId[] parameter. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 indicates ease of exploitability and complete potential compromise of the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Campcodes Supplier Management System is installedLocate the application files on the server or check running web services for Campcodes or Supplier Management referencesAffected if The application is present and running
-
Confirm the installed version is 1.0Check application version file, about page, or metadata within the installation directory; compare against the affected version range (= 1.0)Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0; versions other than 1.0 are not affected by this specific CVE
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of view_unit.php in the /admin/ directory of the application installationAffected if The file /admin/view_unit.php exists in the application
-
Confirm the admin endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the /admin/ path or verify network accessibility to the admin interfaceAffected if The admin interface at /admin/ is accessible (unauthenticated or authenticated)
-
Identify if the chkId[] parameter is processedReview view_unit.php source code or test for the presence of the chkId[] parameter in form submissions or API calls to view_unit.phpAffected if The application processes the chkId[] parameter without parameterization
A user is affected if Campcodes Supplier Management System version 1.0 is installed, the /admin/view_unit.php file exists, and the chkId[] parameter is processed by the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the chkId[] parameter in view_unit.php to prevent SQL injection. Conduct a broader code review to identify and fix similar injection points across the application.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14664 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14664 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data