CVE-2026-0597
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /retailer/edit_profile.php. This manipulation of the argument txtRetailerAddress causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the txtRetailerAddress parameter in /retailer/edit_profile.php. The vulnerability stems from unsanitized user input being directly concatenated into SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the application versionLocate and examine the Campcodes Supplier Management System installation. Check for version identification files, about pages, or headers that indicate the installed version is exactly 1.0Affected if The installed version is Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0
-
Confirm the vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /retailer/edit_profile.php exists within the web application's document root directoryAffected if The file /retailer/edit_profile.php is present in the installation
-
Inspect the SQL query implementationExamine the edit_profile.php file source code. Look for SQL query statements that incorporate the txtRetailerAddress parameter without using prepared statements or parameter bindingAffected if The code contains SQL queries that directly concatenate the txtRetailerAddress parameter without sanitization or parameterized queries
-
Check if retailer profile editing is accessibleVerify that the retailer profile editing functionality is enabled and accessible to users, typically at /retailer/edit_profile.php or similar endpointAffected if The profile editing feature is enabled and reachable in the application
A user is affected if they are running Campcodes Supplier Management System version 1.0 with the edit_profile.php file present and the retailer profile editing feature accessible, where the txtRetailerAddress parameter is handled via direct SQL concatenation rather than parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in edit_profile.php for the txtRetailerAddress parameter, and implement proper input validation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0597 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0597 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data