CVE-2025-14709
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in Shiguangwu sgwbox N3 2.0.25. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /usr/sbin/http_eshell_server of the component WIRELESSCFGGET Interface. The manipulation of the argument params leads to buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability in the WIRELESSCFGGET interface of Shiguangwu sgwbox N3 version 2.0.25 allows remote attackers to overflow the 'params' argument in the /usr/sbin/http_eshell_server binary. This critical flaw (CVSS 9.8) can be exploited remotely without authentication, and a public exploit is already available.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelCheck the device label, web interface, or SSH banner for 'sgwbox N3' or 'Shiguangwu' branding. Firmware version may also be visible in the admin panel (often under System > Firmware or Status).Affected if The device is not a Shiguangwu sgwbox N3, then it is not affected.
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the device's web management interface or check via CLI (e.g., 'cat /etc/version' or 'fw_printenv' if available). Compare the version number to 2.0.25.Affected if Firmware version is 2.0.25 or lower, the device is within the affected range.
-
Verify http_eshell_server binary existsIf you have CLI access (SSH/Telnet), run 'ls -la /usr/sbin/http_eshell_server' to confirm the binary is present on the device.Affected if The binary exists, the vulnerable component is installed.
-
Confirm the WIRELESSCFGGET interface is accessibleAttempt to access the WIRELESSCFGGET endpoint via HTTP/HTTPS request to the device (e.g., curl http://<device-ip>/WIRELESSCFGGET?params=test). A response (even an error) indicates the interface is exposed.Affected if The interface responds, it is reachable and the attack surface is present.
-
Check network exposure of management interfaceReview firewall rules, NAT configuration, or ACLs to determine if the device's web interface (port 80/443) is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if The management interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted networks, the device is remotely exploitable without authentication.
The device is affected if it is a Shiguangwu sgwbox N3 running firmware version 2.0.25 or lower, with the http_eshell_server binary present and its management interface network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor has not responded to early disclosure, organizations should immediately restrict network access to the affected device's management interface, implement network segmentation, and monitor for exploitation attempts until a vendor patch becomes available or consider replacing the device.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14709 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14709 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data