Pro Cloud ServerApplication · Sparxsystems

CVE-2025-15623

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor, : Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pty Ltd. Sparx Pro Cloud Server. Unauthenticated user can retrieve database password in plaintext in certain situations

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Sparx Pro Cloud Server contains an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability allowing remote attackers to retrieve database passwords in plaintext. The issue stems from improper access controls on certain endpoints or APIs that expose sensitive credential data without requiring authentication.

MitigationRestrict network exposure of Sparx Pro Cloud Server to trusted users only, apply vendor patches when available, and rotate any database credentials that may have been exposed. Implement proper authentication and authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pro Cloud ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.0.163

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Sparx Pro Cloud Server is installed
    Check for the presence of Sparx Pro Cloud Server installation directories, services, or processes on the system. Look for process named 'Pro Cloud Server' or check common installation paths.
    Affected if Sparx Pro Cloud Server is found running on the system
  2. Verify the installed version
    Locate the Pro Cloud Server version information - typically found in the application itself, installer logs, or version files within the installation directory. Compare against version 6.0.163.
    Affected if Installed version is exactly 6.0.163
  3. Check network exposure of the server
    Determine if the Pro Cloud Server is accessible from network endpoints. Review firewall rules, network configurations, or bindings that expose the server to external or untrusted networks.
    Affected if Server is reachable from untrusted network locations without VPN or restricted access controls
  4. Test for unauthenticated endpoint access
    Attempt to access the Pro Cloud Server API or web endpoints without providing credentials. Look for endpoints that may return sensitive configuration or credential information.
    Affected if Sensitive endpoints return database passwords or credential data without requiring authentication

A user is affected if Sparx Pro Cloud Server version 6.0.163 is running and its sensitive endpoints are accessible without authentication, allowing exposure of database passwords.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict network exposure of Sparx Pro Cloud Server to trusted users only, apply vendor patches when available, and rotate any database credentials that may have been exposed. Implement proper authentication and authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints.

Fix this in Pro Cloud Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15623 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data