Pro Cloud ServerApplication · Sparxsystems

CVE-2025-15625

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unauthenticated user is able to execute arbitrary SQL commands in Sparx Pro Cloud Server database in certain cases.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Critical SQL injection vulnerability in Sparx Pro Cloud Server allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands directly against the database. The 'in certain cases' qualifier suggests exploitation requires specific conditions, but the lack of authentication requirement and complete SQL access makes this severely dangerous.

MitigationApply vendor patch immediately if available; if no patch exists, implement aggressive input validation, disable unnecessary database permissions, deploy WAF rules to block SQL injection patterns, and restrict network exposure of the Pro Cloud Server to minimize attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pro Cloud ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.0.163

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Pro Cloud Server version
    Locate the Sparxsystems Pro Cloud Server installation and retrieve its version number through the product's built-in about dialog, installer information, or version query command provided by the software
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.0.163
  2. Determine network exposure of the service
    Check if the Pro Cloud Server is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet by reviewing firewall rules, network configuration, and exposure status
    Affected if The service is exposed to unauthenticated/network-accessible users without proper network segmentation
  3. Verify authentication configuration
    Review the Pro Cloud Server security settings to confirm whether authentication mechanisms are properly enforced for all database-facing endpoints
    Affected if Unauthenticated access to database functionality is possible due to misconfigured or disabled authentication
  4. Check for SQL injection indicators
    Review server logs, audit trails, and database query logs for suspicious or unexpected SQL commands, especially from unauthenticated sources
    Affected if Logs show SQL commands originating from unauthenticated sessions or unexpected SQL patterns indicating exploitation attempts

A user is affected if their Sparxsystems Pro Cloud Server is version 6.0.163 and is accessible to unauthenticated attackers on the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch immediately if available; if no patch exists, implement aggressive input validation, disable unnecessary database permissions, deploy WAF rules to block SQL injection patterns, and restrict network exposure of the Pro Cloud Server to minimize attack surface.

Fix this in Pro Cloud Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15625 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data