CVE-2025-1924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in Vnet/IP Interface Package provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. If affected product receive maliciously crafted packets, a DoS attack may cause Vnet/IP communication functions to stop or arbitrary programs to be executed. The affected products and versions are as follows: Vnet/IP Interface Package (for CENTUM VP R6 VP6C3300, CENTUM VP R7 VP7C3300) R1.07.00 or earlier
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in Yokogawa's Vnet/IP Interface Package allows remote attackers to send maliciously crafted packets that can cause denial of service (DoS) to Vnet/IP communication functions or achieve arbitrary program execution. This affects CENTUM VP R6 and R7 systems running version R1.07.00 or earlier.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< r1.08.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Vnet/IP Interface Package installationLocate and identify the Yokogawa Vnet/IP Interface Package software on the system. Check installed programs or product directories for CENTUM VP R6/R7 related components.Affected if The Vnet/IP Interface Package is installed on the system.
-
Determine installed version of Vnet/IP Interface PackageUse the software's version reporting mechanism (such as 'About' dialog, version info in control panel, or product-specific query command) to obtain the exact installed version number.Affected if The installed version is R1.07.00 or earlier (versions prior to R1.08.00).
-
Verify Vnet/IP communications component is activeCheck if the Vnet/IP communication service or daemon is running. Look for Vnet/IP related processes or services in the system task manager or service console.Affected if The Vnet/IP Interface Package service/process is actively running and listening on network ports.
-
Assess network exposure of Vnet/IP interfaceIdentify network ports and interfaces the Vnet/IP component is bound to. Use netstat or equivalent to list listening ports associated with Vnet/IP.Affected if The Vnet/IP interface is accessible on network segments accessible to untrusted users (not isolated by firewall or network segmentation).
The system is affected if Vnet/IP Interface Package version R1.07.00 or earlier is installed and the Vnet/IP communication service is running and exposed on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Vnet/IP Interface Package to a version newer than R1.07.00. Until patched, implement network segmentation and monitor for suspicious packet traffic to limit exposure to this vulnerability.
Vnet/IP Interface Package R1.08.00
- 1. Identify all systems running Vnet/IP Interface Package in the environment
- 2. Verify current installed version by checking the application or system documentation
- 3. Obtain Vnet/IP Interface Package R1.08.00 from official Yokogawa Electric Corporation sources (web-material3.yokogawa.com or official support channels)
- 4. Schedule maintenance window as the upgrade may require system restart
- 5. Backup current configuration and data before performing upgrade
- 6. Install Vnet/IP Interface Package R1.08.00 following Yokogawa's official installation procedures
- 7. After installation, verify the version has been updated correctly
- 8. Test Vnet/IP communication functions to ensure normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data