CVE-2025-48023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in Vnet/IP Interface Package provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. If affected product receives maliciously crafted packets, Vnet/IP software stack process may be terminated. The affected products and versions are as follows: Vnet/IP Interface Package (for CENTUM VP R6 VP6C3300, CENTUM VP R7 VP7C3300) R1.07.00 or earlier
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Yokogawa's Vnet/IP Interface Package software stack. When the affected product receives maliciously crafted packets, the Vnet/IP software stack process terminates unexpectedly, causing service disruption. This affects CENTUM VP R6 and R7 systems running version R1.07.00 or earlier.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< r1.08.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Vnet/IP Interface Package is installedCheck for the presence of Yokogawa Vnet/IP software on the system by examining installed programs, program files directory, or running 'Get-ItemProperty' on registry key HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for Yokogawa entriesAffected if The Vnet/IP Interface Package software is found on the system
-
Determine installed Vnet/IP versionLocate the version information through the Windows Add/Remove Programs panel, the software's About dialog, or by checking the version resource in the Vnet/IP executable files typically located in C:\Program Files\Yokogawa\VnetIP or similar installation directoryAffected if The version number returned is R1.07.00 or any version prior to R1.08.00
-
Confirm system is CENTUM VP R6 or R7Verify the Yokogawa CENTUM VP version running on the system by checking the CENTUM installation directory or system information, typically found in C:\Program Files\Yokogawa\CENTUM VPAffected if The system is running CENTUM VP R6 or CENTUM VP R7
-
Verify Vnet/IP network exposureCheck if the Vnet/IP service ports (typically UDP/TCP ports used by Vnet/IP protocol) are listening on network interfaces accessible from untrusted networks using 'netstat -an' or by reviewing firewall rulesAffected if Vnet/IP ports are exposed to untrusted network segments
The environment is affected if Vnet/IP Interface Package version R1.07.00 or earlier is installed on a CENTUM VP R6 or R7 system, particularly if the Vnet/IP service is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a fixed version of Vnet/IP Interface Package beyond R1.07.00. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider network segmentation and filtering to limit exposure to untrusted packet sources.
Vnet/IP Interface Package R1.08.00
- Obtain Vnet/IP Interface Package R1.08.00 or later from Yokogawa Electric Corporation's official distribution channels (refer to web-material3.yokogawa.com)
- Follow Yokogawa's standard procedures for upgrading the Vnet/IP Interface Package
- After upgrade, verify that the Vnet/IP software stack process remains stable and does not terminate upon receiving network packets
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data