CVE-2025-20050
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled search path for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an uncontrolled search path vulnerability (DLL hijacking) in Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001. An authenticated unprivileged user with local access and high complexity attack requiring active user interaction can exploit the application's insecure library loading to achieve local code execution with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.11001CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Intel Computing Improvement Program is installedLocate the Intel Computing Improvement Program installation on the system - check Program Files directories or use system inventory tools to find this software packageAffected if The software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed version of Intel CIPUse system tools to query the installed version of Intel Computing Improvement Program (check Add/Remove Programs, program directory, or version information in the application executable)Affected if The installed version number is lower than 2.4.11001
-
Check if application runs with elevated privilegesReview the service or scheduled task configuration for Intel CIP to determine if it executes with elevated or SYSTEM privilegesAffected if The application runs with elevated privileges and an unprivileged user can place files in accessible directories
-
Examine DLL search path exposureObserve the application behavior or review documentation to identify if untrusted directories are in the DLL search path, allowing placement of malicious DLLs by low-privilege usersAffected if The application loads DLLs from user-writable directories without explicit path specification
The environment is affected if Intel Computing Improvement Program version 2.4.11001 or higher is NOT installed and the application loads DLLs from directories writable by unprivileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.11001
Upgrade Intel CIP software to version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 or later. Additionally, enforce strict file system permissions on application directories to prevent unauthorized placement of malicious DLLs in search paths.
WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 (Intel Computing Improvement Program 2.4.0.11001)
- Identify the currently installed version of Intel Computing Improvement Program via Windows Settings > Apps or Control Panel > Programs and Features
- Download the latest version of Intel Computing Improvement Program from Intel's official support website (support.intel.com)
- Close any running Intel CIP applications and related processes
- Uninstall the current version of Intel Computing Improvement Program through Windows Settings > Apps or Control Panel > Programs and Features
- Restart the system if prompted by the uninstaller
- Install the updated Intel Computing Improvement Program version 2.4.0.11001 or later
- Verify the installed version matches the target version after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20050 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20050 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data