CVE-2025-20125
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in an API of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with valid read-only credentials to obtain sensitive information, change node configurations, and restart the node. This vulnerability is due to a lack of authorization in a specific API and improper validation of user-supplied data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to a specific API on the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to attacker to obtain information, modify system configuration, and reload the device. Note: To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid read-only administrative credentials. In a single-node deployment, new devices will not be able to authenticate during the reload time.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authorization bypass vulnerability in a specific API endpoint of Cisco ISE where the system fails to properly enforce read-only permission boundaries. An attacker with valid read-only credentials can send crafted HTTP requests to bypass authorization checks and perform privileged operations including sensitive information disclosure, configuration modification, and node restart. The vulnerability stems from both missing authorization enforcement and inadequate validation of user-supplied data in the affected API.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.1= 3.1.0= 3.2.0= 3.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco ISE versionRun 'show version' in the Cisco ISE CLI or check the version in the Administration > System > Settings > Server Certificate page in the admin UIAffected if The installed version is < 3.1, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, or 3.3.0 (these are the vulnerable versions)
-
Confirm API endpoint exposureIdentify if the Cisco ISE API is network-accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules and access lists allowing inbound access to port 443 (HTTPS) on the ISE management interfaceAffected if The ISE admin API port is accessible from networks outside the trusted administrative zone
-
Review admin audit logs for privilege escalationIn Cisco ISE, go to Operations > RADIUS > Live Logs or use the API to query admin audit logs. Look for operations performed by users with the 'Read-Only Admin' role that exceed read-only permissionsAffected if Audit logs show read-only admin accounts performing configuration changes, node operations, or accessing sensitive data they should not have access to
-
Check for unauthorized configuration modificationsIn the Cisco ISE admin UI, navigate to Administration > Sessions > Activity. Filter for configuration-related operations and verify the administrator role associated with each actionAffected if Configuration changes (network device modifications, policy updates, trustsec changes) were performed by accounts assigned only read-only access
-
Verify node operation logs for unauthorized restartsCheck Cisco ISE system logs and the Operations > Diagnostics > System Diagnostic Logs for node restart or reload commands. Correlate with admin session logs to identify the initiating accountAffected if Node restart or reload operations were initiated by accounts with only read-only privileges
You are affected if you run Cisco ISE version 3.1.0, 3.2.0, or 3.3.0 (or any version below 3.1) and your read-only admin accounts have performed privileged operations that they should not be able to do.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.1
Apply the Cisco ISE patch when available. Until then, restrict network access to the API endpoint, monitor for unusual API activity, and limit administrative credential exposure. In single-node deployments, plan maintenance windows carefully due to reload impact.
Cisco ISE version 3.4.0 or later (e.g., 3.4.0, 3.5.0)
- 1. Back up the current Cisco ISE configuration before starting the upgrade process.
- 2. Download the fixed Cisco ISE version from the Cisco Software Download page (requires valid Cisco service contract).
- 3. Verify the upgrade path is supported for your deployment topology (standalone, distributed, or standalone-to-distributed).
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as the node reload will cause service interruption.
- 5. Upload the ISO image to the Cisco ISE primary node.
- 6. Initiate the upgrade through the ISE administration GUI or CLI using the 'upgrade' command.
- 7. After the primary node upgrades and services restart, verify all services are operational.
- 8. For distributed deployments, proceed with upgrading secondary nodes one at a time, ensuring each node is fully operational before proceeding to the next.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20125 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20125 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data