CVE-2025-20189
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco Express Forwarding functionality of Cisco IOS XE Software for Cisco ASR 903 Aggregation Services Routers with Route Switch Processor 3 (RSP3C) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to trigger a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper memory management when Cisco IOS XE Software is processing Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted ARP messages at a high rate over a period of time to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust system resources, which eventually triggers a reload of the active route switch processor (RSP). If a redundant RSP is not present, the router reloads.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory management flaw in the Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF) subsystem of Cisco IOS XE on ASR 903 routers with RSP3C processors allows an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker to trigger resource exhaustion by sending crafted ARP messages at high rates. This causes the active Route Switch Processor to reload, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.16.0cs= 3.16.0s= 3.16.1as= 3.16.1s= 3.16.2as= 3.16.2bs= 3.16.2s= 3.16.3as= 3.16.3s= 3.16.4as= 3.16.4bs= 3.16.4dsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router hardware modelRun 'show platform' or 'show version' and look for ASR 903 in the hardware descriptionAffected if The router is not an ASR 903 series device, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Confirm the RSP3C processor moduleRun 'show module' or 'show inventory' and verify the presence of RSP3 in the module listingAffected if The router does not have an RSP3 or RSP3C module installed, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Check the installed IOS XE versionRun 'show version' and locate the IOS XE software version in the output. Compare the full version string against the affected versions: 3.16.0cs, 3.16.0s, 3.16.1as, 3.16.1s, 3.16.2as, 3.16.2bs, 3.16.2s, 3.16.3as, 3.16.3s, 3.16.4as, 3.16.4bs, 3.16.4dsAffected if The installed version exactly matches one of the listed affected versions, the system is potentially vulnerable
-
Verify Cisco Express Forwarding is enabledRun 'show cef interface' or 'show ip cef' to check CEF operational statusAffected if CEF is enabled and running, the crafted ARP traffic can trigger the memory exhaustion condition
You are affected if your ASR 903 router with RSP3C runs one of the listed 3.16.x IOS XE versions and has CEF enabled, allowing adjacent attackers to send high-rate ARP traffic that causes processor reload.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco-provided patch when available; in the interim, implement ARP rate limiting and ACLs on exposed interfaces to restrict adjacent attacker access.
Upgrade to the Cisco IOS XE fixed release specified in the CVE-2025-20189 security advisory (obtain exact version from sec.cloudapps.cisco.com)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco IOS XE software version on the affected ASR 903 router with RSP3C using 'show version' command
- 2. Access the Cisco Security Advisory at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for CVE-2025-20189 to obtain the specific fixed release version
- 3. Download the fixed IOS XE release from Cisco's software download center
- 4. Before upgrading, ensure you have a valid configuration backup using 'show running-config' and 'show startup-config'
- 5. If the router has a redundant RSP, verify redundancy status using 'show redundancy'
- 6. Upgrade the IOS XE software following Cisco's standard upgrade procedures for ASR 903 routers
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed using 'show version'
- 8. Confirm Cisco Express Forwarding is operational using 'show ip cef'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,760.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20189 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20189 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data