CVE-2025-20199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with privilege level 15 to elevate privileges to root on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing specific configuration commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including crafted input in specific configuration commands. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root on the underlying operating system of an affected device. The security impact rating (SIR) of this advisory has been raised to High because an attacker could gain access to the underlying operating system of the affected device and perform potentially undetected actions. Note: The attacker must have privileges to enter configuration mode on the affected device. This is usually referred to as privilege level 15.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE Software CLI allows authenticated privilege level 15 users to gain root access on the underlying Linux-based OS. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation when processing specific configuration commands, enabling attackers to inject crafted input that bypasses privilege boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.2.0se= 3.2.1se= 3.2.2se= 3.2.3se= 3.3.0se= 3.3.1se= 3.3.2se= 3.3.3se= 3.3.4se= 3.3.5se= 3.4.0sg= 3.4.1sgCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the IOS XE versionExecute 'show version' or 'show version | include Version' in the CLIAffected if The displayed version matches one of the affected versions: 3.2.0se, 3.2.1se, 3.2.2se, 3.2.3se, 3.3.0se, 3.3.1se, 3.3.2se, 3.3.3se, 3.3.4se, 3.3.5se, 3.4.0sg, or 3.4.1sg
-
Confirm the device platformExecute 'show version' and verify the output shows 'IOS XE' rather than classic IOSAffected if The device runs IOS XE software and the version from step 1 is in the affected list
-
Check for privilege level 15 usersExecute 'show running-config | include username' and review user accounts with privilege level 15, or use 'show privilege' after login to confirm current privilege levelAffected if Privilege level 15 users exist on the device, which is required for exploitation of this vulnerability
-
Review recent configuration changesExecute 'show archive config differences' or check the configuration log with 'show logging | include CONFIG' for recent changesAffected if Suspicious or unexpected configuration commands appear that may indicate exploitation attempts
-
Audit device access logsReview 'show logging' output and external syslog records for login events from privilege level 15 accounts, focusing on unusual command execution patternsAffected if Log entries show unexpected commands or sessions from legitimate privilege level 15 users that were not initiated by authorized administrators
You are affected if your Cisco IOS XE device runs version 3.2.0se through 3.4.1sg AND has privilege level 15 user accounts that could potentially inject crafted configuration commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco-provided patches when available; otherwise, strictly limit privilege level 15 access, monitor for unauthorized configuration changes, and audit device access logs for suspicious activity.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data