FinesseApplication · Cisco

CVE-2025-20278

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 12.6 or later.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the CLI of multiple Cisco Unified Communications products could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device as the root user. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied command arguments. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by executing crafted commands on the CLI of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device as the root user. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Command injection vulnerability in the CLI of multiple Cisco Unified Communications products allows an authenticated attacker with valid administrative credentials to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying OS due to improper validation of user-supplied command arguments.

MitigationApply Cisco's security updates/patches for affected Unified Communications products. Until patched, limit CLI access to trusted administrators and monitor for suspicious command execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FinesseApplication
Affected:= 10.5\(1\)= 10.5\(1\)_es1= 10.5\(1\)_es2= 10.5\(1\)_es3= 10.5\(1\)_es4= 10.5\(1\)_es5= 10.5\(1\)_es6= 10.5\(1\)_es7= 10.5\(1\)_es8= 10.5\(1\)_es9= 10.5\(1\)_es10= 11.0\(1\)
SocialminerApplication
Affected:= 10.5\(1\)= 10.6\(1\)= 10.6\(2\)= 11.0\(1\)= 11.5\(1\)= 11.5\(1\)su1= 11.6\(1\)= 11.6\(2\)= 12.0\(1\)= 12.0\(1\)es02= 12.0\(1\)es03= 12.0\(1\)es04
Unified Communications ManagerApplication
Affected:= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6= 12.5\(1\)su7= 12.5\(1\)su7a= 12.5\(1\)su8= 12.5\(1\)su8a= 12.5\(1\)su9
Unified Communications Manager Im And Presence ServiceApplication
Affected:= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6= 12.5\(1\)su7= 12.5\(1\)su8= 12.5\(1\)su9
Unified Contact Center ExpressApplication
Affected:= 8.5\(1\)= 9.0\(2\)su3es04= 10.0\(1\)su1= 10.0\(1\)su1es04= 10.5\(1\)= 10.5\(1\)su1= 10.5\(1\)su1es10= 10.6\(1\)= 10.6\(1\)su1= 10.6\(1\)su2= 10.6\(1\)su2es04= 10.6\(1\)su3
Unified Intelligence CenterApplication
Affected:< 12.6\(2\)es_04
Unity ConnectionApplication
Affected:= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6= 12.5\(1\)su7= 12.5\(1\)su8= 12.5\(1\)su8a= 12.5\(1\)su9
Virtualized Voice BrowserApplication
Affected:< 12.6\(2\)es06

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Cisco Unified Communications product
    Access the CLI via SSH or console and run 'show version' or check the admin web interface to determine which product (Finesse, Socialminer, CUCM, UCCX, UIC, Unity Connection, or VVB) is running
    Affected if Any of the listed products is installed
  2. Determine the product version
    Run the CLI command 'show version' or check the About page in the admin web interface to obtain the exact version number (for example, 10.5(1), 12.5(1)su1, 11.6(1))
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the versions listed in the affected products and versions for that specific product
  3. Verify CLI administration is enabled
    Check if the command-line interface is accessible for administrative purposes. Confirm that admin accounts exist and can log in via SSH or console
    Affected if CLI administrative access is available (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
  4. Review CLI command logs for suspicious activity
    Check system logs or run 'show log' in the CLI for unexpected or malformed commands, especially those containing shell metacharacters like ; | & $ or backticks
    Affected if Unexpected commands appear in logs or admin audit logs show commands not initiated by legitimate administrators

The environment is affected if a Cisco Unified Communications product is running a version matching one of the listed affected versions AND CLI administrative access is available, allowing an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary commands.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 12.6 or later
Fixed in 12.6
Interim mitigation

Apply Cisco's security updates/patches for affected Unified Communications products. Until patched, limit CLI access to trusted administrators and monitor for suspicious command execution.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to the fixed release as specified in the Cisco advisory for each product (fixed versions vary by product; check sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for product-specific fixed releases)

  1. 1. Identify the specific Cisco Unified Communications product (Finesse, Socialminer, Unified Communications Manager, Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence Service, Unified Contact Center Express, Unified Intelligence Center, Unity Connection, or Virtualized Voice Browser) affected in your environment
  2. 2. Determine the exact version and sub-version (e.g., 12.5(1), 12.5(1)su1) currently installed
  3. 3. Navigate to Cisco's official security advisory portal at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com and search for CVE-2025-20278
  4. 4. Locate the specific advisory for your product to obtain the fixed version information
  5. 5. Plan maintenance window for the upgrade, as this requires CLI access with administrative credentials
  6. 6. Obtain the appropriate upgrade package or ISO from Cisco for your specific product and current version
  7. 7. Execute the upgrade following Cisco's standard upgrade procedures for the respective product
  8. 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number post-upgrade
Caveat Upgrades between major versions (e.g., 10.x to 12.x) may require careful planning and could have feature/behavior changes; ensure compatibility with existing integrations

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Finesse Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,180
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20278 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data