CVE-2025-20278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of multiple Cisco Unified Communications products could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device as the root user. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied command arguments. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by executing crafted commands on the CLI of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device as the root user. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the CLI of multiple Cisco Unified Communications products allows an authenticated attacker with valid administrative credentials to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying OS due to improper validation of user-supplied command arguments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.5\(1\)= 10.5\(1\)_es1= 10.5\(1\)_es2= 10.5\(1\)_es3= 10.5\(1\)_es4= 10.5\(1\)_es5= 10.5\(1\)_es6= 10.5\(1\)_es7= 10.5\(1\)_es8= 10.5\(1\)_es9= 10.5\(1\)_es10= 11.0\(1\)= 10.5\(1\)= 10.6\(1\)= 10.6\(2\)= 11.0\(1\)= 11.5\(1\)= 11.5\(1\)su1= 11.6\(1\)= 11.6\(2\)= 12.0\(1\)= 12.0\(1\)es02= 12.0\(1\)es03= 12.0\(1\)es04= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6= 12.5\(1\)su7= 12.5\(1\)su7a= 12.5\(1\)su8= 12.5\(1\)su8a= 12.5\(1\)su9= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6= 12.5\(1\)su7= 12.5\(1\)su8= 12.5\(1\)su9= 8.5\(1\)= 9.0\(2\)su3es04= 10.0\(1\)su1= 10.0\(1\)su1es04= 10.5\(1\)= 10.5\(1\)su1= 10.5\(1\)su1es10= 10.6\(1\)= 10.6\(1\)su1= 10.6\(1\)su2= 10.6\(1\)su2es04= 10.6\(1\)su3< 12.6\(2\)es_04= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6= 12.5\(1\)su7= 12.5\(1\)su8= 12.5\(1\)su8a= 12.5\(1\)su9< 12.6\(2\)es06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco Unified Communications productAccess the CLI via SSH or console and run 'show version' or check the admin web interface to determine which product (Finesse, Socialminer, CUCM, UCCX, UIC, Unity Connection, or VVB) is runningAffected if Any of the listed products is installed
-
Determine the product versionRun the CLI command 'show version' or check the About page in the admin web interface to obtain the exact version number (for example, 10.5(1), 12.5(1)su1, 11.6(1))Affected if The installed version matches one of the versions listed in the affected products and versions for that specific product
-
Verify CLI administration is enabledCheck if the command-line interface is accessible for administrative purposes. Confirm that admin accounts exist and can log in via SSH or consoleAffected if CLI administrative access is available (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Review CLI command logs for suspicious activityCheck system logs or run 'show log' in the CLI for unexpected or malformed commands, especially those containing shell metacharacters like ; | & $ or backticksAffected if Unexpected commands appear in logs or admin audit logs show commands not initiated by legitimate administrators
The environment is affected if a Cisco Unified Communications product is running a version matching one of the listed affected versions AND CLI administrative access is available, allowing an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.6
Apply Cisco's security updates/patches for affected Unified Communications products. Until patched, limit CLI access to trusted administrators and monitor for suspicious command execution.
Upgrade to the fixed release as specified in the Cisco advisory for each product (fixed versions vary by product; check sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for product-specific fixed releases)
- 1. Identify the specific Cisco Unified Communications product (Finesse, Socialminer, Unified Communications Manager, Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence Service, Unified Contact Center Express, Unified Intelligence Center, Unity Connection, or Virtualized Voice Browser) affected in your environment
- 2. Determine the exact version and sub-version (e.g., 12.5(1), 12.5(1)su1) currently installed
- 3. Navigate to Cisco's official security advisory portal at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com and search for CVE-2025-20278
- 4. Locate the specific advisory for your product to obtain the fixed version information
- 5. Plan maintenance window for the upgrade, as this requires CLI access with administrative credentials
- 6. Obtain the appropriate upgrade package or ISO from Cisco for your specific product and current version
- 7. Execute the upgrade following Cisco's standard upgrade procedures for the respective product
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data