CVE-2025-20344
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the backup restore functionality of Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a path traversal attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of the contents of a backup file. An attacker with valid Administrator credentials could exploit this vulnerability by restoring a crafted backup file to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain root privileges on the underlying shell on the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Cisco Nexus Dashboard's backup restore function allows authenticated administrators to write arbitrary files to the filesystem by restoring a crafted backup file with manipulated path references, leading to root shell access on the underlying OS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1\(1g\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Nexus Dashboard versionAccess the Nexus Dashboard admin interface or run 'show version' via CLI to retrieve the installed software versionAffected if Version is earlier than 4.1(1g)
-
Locate backup restore logsNavigate to the administrative logging section of Nexus Dashboard and search for 'restore' or 'backup' operations, typically found under System > Logs or Admin > Backup & RestoreAffected if Backup restore operations have been performed using untrusted or externally-sourced backup files
-
Examine filesystem for unexpected filesReview the underlying filesystem for newly created or modified files in system directories such as /, /home, /tmp, or /opt, especially executable scripts or binary files not part of a standard installationAffected if Unknown files exist in system directories, particularly in locations writable via the backup restore mechanism
-
Audit administrator accountsList all administrator accounts configured in Nexus Dashboard under Admin > Users or via 'show admin users' CLI command and verify each account is authorizedAffected if Unexpected or unauthorized administrator accounts are present, indicating potential privilege escalation via the vulnerability
The environment is affected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard version is below 4.1(1g) and the backup restore feature has been used, or if unauthorized files or administrator accounts are detected on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1
Restrict Administrator account access to trusted personnel only, validate backup file integrity before restore, and apply Cisco's patch when released.
Nexus Dashboard version 4.1(1g) or later
- 1. Identify current Nexus Dashboard version by navigating to the Dashboard UI and checking the version info, or via CLI with 'show version'
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Obtain the fixed release (4.1(1g) or later) from Cisco's software download center at cisco.com or your authorized reseller
- 4. Create a full backup of the current Nexus Dashboard configuration before proceeding
- 5. Follow Cisco's official upgrade guide for Nexus Dashboard - upload the .iso image and initiate the upgrade via the UI or CLI
- 6. Monitor the upgrade process and ensure the system reboots successfully
- 7. After upgrade completes, verify the version is now 4.1(1g) or later using 'show version'
- 8. Log in as Administrator and verify backup/restore functionality works correctly with a test backup
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,856.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20344 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data