CVE-2025-20347
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the REST API endpoints of Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (NDFC) could allow an authenticated, low-privileged, remote attacker to view sensitive information or upload and modify files on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because of missing authorization controls on some REST API endpoints. An attacker could exploit th vulnerability by sending crafted API requests to an affected endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform limited Administrator functions, such as accessing sensitive information regarding HTTP Proxy and NTP configurations, uploading images, and damaging image files on an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a broken access control vulnerability in Cisco Nexus Dashboard and NDFC REST APIs where missing authorization checks on certain endpoints allow low-privileged authenticated users to perform administrative functions. Attackers can access sensitive configuration data (HTTP Proxy, NTP settings) and perform unauthorized file operations including uploads and image file modification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1\(1g\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nexus Dashboard versionAccess the Nexus Dashboard admin interface or use the 'show version' CLI command via SSH to retrieve the installed software version. Compare against the affected range: versions prior to 4.1(1g).Affected if Installed version is below 4.1(1g)
-
Confirm NDFC REST API is enabledCheck the Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (NDFC) configuration settings or API service status to determine if REST API endpoints are exposed and operational.Affected if NDFC REST API is enabled and accessible
-
Review user account privilege levelsEnumerate user accounts in the Nexus Dashboard user database. Identify accounts with API access that hold roles below Administrator level.Affected if Low-privileged users (non-administrator roles) have API authentication credentials
-
Inspect API access logs for privilege escalationExamine API request logs for any instances where non-administrator accounts accessed administrative endpoints, particularly those related to HTTP Proxy configuration, NTP settings, file uploads, or image file modifications.Affected if Logs show low-privileged users accessing administrative API endpoints
-
Verify sensitive config exposureUsing a low-privileged API account, attempt to query endpoints that expose HTTP Proxy settings, NTP configuration, or file operation interfaces. If these return data without authorization failure, the vulnerability is present.Affected if Low-privileged API accounts can retrieve HTTP Proxy, NTP settings, or access file operation endpoints
Environment is affected if Nexus Dashboard version is below 4.1(1g), the REST API is enabled, and low-privileged authenticated users can access administrative endpoints or sensitive configuration data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1
Apply Cisco's patch when released; until then, restrict API endpoint access via network segmentation and monitor for anomalous API requests from non-administrator accounts.
Nexus Dashboard 4.1(1g) or later (NDFC releases aligned with this version)
- Verify current Nexus Dashboard version via web UI or API (GET /api/v1/system)
- Review upgrade prerequisites and compatibility matrix in Cisco Nexus Dashboard documentation
- Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require downtime
- Back up current Nexus Dashboard configuration and any critical data
- Download Nexus Dashboard 4.1(1g) or later from Cisco Software Downloads (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- Upload the upgrade image via Nexus Dashboard web UI (System > Upgrade) or API
- Follow Cisco upgrade procedure to apply the new image
- After upgrade, verify the system is healthy and all services are operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20347 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20347 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data