CVE-2025-23225
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM MQ 9.3 LTS, 9.3 CD, 9.4 LTS, and 9.4 CD could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to the improper handling of invalid headers sent to the queue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM MQ versions 9.3 LTS, 9.3 CD, 9.4 LTS, and 9.4 CD contain a denial of service vulnerability where authenticated users can send specially crafted invalid headers to a queue, causing the queue manager to fail or become unresponsive due to improper handling of these malformed headers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 9.4.2>= 9.3.0.0, <= 9.3.0.27>= 9.4.0.0, <= 9.4.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM MQ versionRun 'dspmqver' command or check the IBM MQ installation directory for version information. On appliance, use 'runmqsc' or check /opt/mqm installation.Affected if The installed version is 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.27, or 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.10, or any version 9.4.2 or below on appliance.
-
Confirm product type is IBM MQ ApplianceDetermine if the IBM MQ installation is running as an appliance (dedicated hardware appliance) rather than traditional queue manager on server. Check system documentation or run 'mqsinfo' if available.Affected if The affected product is specifically IBM MQ Appliance, not standard queue manager installations.
-
Verify user authentication is enabledCheck queue manager authentication settings using 'runmqsc' and DISPLAY AUTHREC commands, or check CHLAUTH and CONNAUTH settings in the queue manager configuration.Affected if User authentication is enabled (CONNAUTH set to an authentication mechanism), which is required for authenticated users to exploit this vulnerability.
-
Review queue access controlsInspect ACLs and authorization records for queues using 'DISPLAY AUTHREC' or 'DISPLAY QPERMS' in runmqsc to determine which authenticated users can put messages to queues.Affected if Authenticated users have direct access to put messages on queues without additional approval or filtering.
You are affected if you are running IBM MQ Appliance versions 9.3.0.0-9.3.0.27, 9.4.0.0-9.4.0.10, or 9.4.2 and below with authenticated user access to queues.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the IBM MQ patch or upgrade to a fixed version as provided by IBM. In the interim, consider restricting queue access to only trusted authenticated users and monitoring for unusual queue activity.
IBM MQ 9.3.0.28+ (LTS), 9.3.1+ (CD), 9.4.0.11+ (LTS), 9.4.1+ (CD), or latest LTS release
- 1. Identify the current IBM MQ version in use by running 'dspmqver' or checking the IBM MQ console.
- 2. Determine if the installation is LTS (Long Term Support) or CD (Continuous Delivery) to select the appropriate upgrade path.
- 3. For IBM MQ 9.3 LTS: Upgrade to version 9.3.0.28 or later.
- 4. For IBM MQ 9.4 LTS: Upgrade to version 9.4.0.11 or later, or to 9.4.3 or later.
- 5. For IBM MQ 9.3 CD: Upgrade to version 9.3.1 or later.
- 6. For IBM MQ 9.4 CD: Upgrade to version 9.4.1 or later.
- 7. Download the appropriate IBM MQ fix pack from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/).
- 8. Stop all IBM MQ queue managers and listeners before applying the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23225 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data