CVE-2025-23411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmySCADA myPRO Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF), which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information. An attacker would need to trick the victim in to visiting an attacker-controlled website.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencemySCADA myPRO Manager contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker can craft malicious links on an attacker-controlled website that, when visited by an authenticated user, can cause the victim's browser to send unintended requests to the myPRO Manager application, potentially allowing unauthorized access to sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed myPRO versionAccess the myPRO Manager web interface and navigate to the About/Help section, or check the version displayed in the login page or admin dashboard. Alternatively, inspect HTTP response headers or check the application installation directory for version information.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.4 (e.g., 1.3.x, 1.2.x, etc.)
-
Inspect web forms for anti-CSRF tokensLog into myPRO Manager, open browser developer tools (F12), go to the Network tab, and perform a state-changing action (e.g., create a user, modify settings, save configuration). Inspect the POST request payload and the original HTML form for a hidden token field or anti-CSRF parameter.Affected if No anti-CSRF token parameter is present in state-changing form submissions or API requests.
-
Check session cookie SameSite attributeIn browser developer tools, go to the Application tab and expand Cookies. Select the myPRO domain and examine the session cookie. Alternatively, capture an HTTP response using a proxy (e.g., Burp, OWASP ZAP) and inspect the Set-Cookie header for the SameSite attribute.Affected if The session cookie lacks the SameSite attribute, or it is set to None without Secure flag, or is missing entirely.
-
Verify authenticated access to web interfaceConfirm that the myPRO Manager web interface is accessible and that user authentication is required to access sensitive functions. Attempt to access protected endpoints without authentication or check if sessions are required.Affected if The web interface is accessible to unauthenticated users, or authenticated sessions can be hijacked via CSRF because no token validation occurs.
A user is affected if their myPRO Manager version is below 1.4 AND the application lacks anti-CSRF tokens in state-changing operations AND session cookies do not have proper SameSite attributes configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4
Implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and configure SameSite attributes on session cookies to prevent CSRF attacks.
1.4
- 1. Download the latest mySCADA myPRO version 1.4 from the official vendor website (www.myscada.org)
- 2. Back up the existing myPRO configuration and project files before upgrading
- 3. Stop the myPRO Manager service if it is currently running
- 4. Install version 1.4 following the vendor's installation instructions
- 5. Restore the backed-up configuration and project files to the new installation
- 6. Start the myPRO Manager service and verify the application is functioning correctly
- 7. Verify that the CSRF protection mechanisms are properly functioning in the upgraded version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,768.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-23411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-23411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data