CVE-2025-24447
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedColdFusion versions 2023.12, 2021.18, 2025.0 and earlier are affected by a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user resulting in a High impact to Confidentiality and Integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceColdFusion versions 2023.12, 2021.18, 2025.0 and earlier contain a deserialization vulnerability where untrusted data is processed without proper validation, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the ColdFusion service user. The flaw is exploitable without any authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2021= 2023= 2025CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ColdFusion versionAccess the ColdFusion Administrator console (usually at /cfide/administrator/ or /CFRame/index.cfm) and check the version displayed on the login or about page. Alternatively, check the version file in the ColdFusion installation directory or registry on Windows.Affected if The installed version is 2023.12 or earlier, 2021.18 or earlier, or 2025.0 (any build), or if the version cannot be determined but the product is present.
-
Check ColdFusion service statusOn Windows, open Services console and locate 'ColdFusion 2023', 'ColdFusion 2021', or 'ColdFusion 2025' service. On Linux/Unix, check for coldfusion processes running.Affected if The ColdFusion service is running and the version falls within the affected ranges.
-
Verify patch status via hotfix listIn ColdFusion Administrator, navigate to the Updates or Hotfixes section to view applied patches. Compare the installed version number against the fixed releases (2023.13 and later, 2021.19 and later, 2025.1 and later).Affected if No hotfix or patch matching the fixed versions is installed, or the patch list is empty/unavailable.
-
Check for exposed BlazeDS/AMF endpointsSearch web server logs and ColdFusion configuration for access to /flex2gateway/, /messagebroker/*, or /cfapi/ endpoints. These are common paths for AMF/BlazeDS services that handle deserialized data.Affected if These endpoints are accessible remotely without authentication and the ColdFusion version is within the affected range.
If ColdFusion 2023.12 or earlier, 2021.18 or earlier, or 2025.0 is running without the vendor patch applied, the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via deserialization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a supported ColdFusion version that addresses this deserialization flaw. Verify the fix does not introduce regressions in existing ColdFusion applications.
Upgrade to ColdFusion 2023.13 or later, ColdFusion 2021.19 or later, or ColdFusion 2025.1 or later depending on your major version
- 1. Identify the currently installed ColdFusion version by checking the ColdFusion Administrator console or the version information in the installation directory.
- 2. Navigate to the Adobe ColdFusion security bulletins page at helpx.adobe.com to obtain the latest security updates.
- 3. Download the appropriate ColdFusion update for your version: For ColdFusion 2023, obtain version 2023.13 or later; For ColdFusion 2021, obtain version 2021.19 or later; For ColdFusion 2025, obtain version 2025.1 or later.
- 4. Before applying the update, perform a complete backup of the ColdFusion installation directory, including the cfusion directory and any custom configurations.
- 5. Stop the ColdFusion application server services to ensure a clean update process.
- 6. Apply the downloaded security update following Adobe's official installation instructions.
- 7. After installation, verify that the ColdFusion services start successfully.
- 8. Review the ColdFusion Administrator to confirm the updated version number reflects the patched release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24447 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24447 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data