CVE-2025-24863
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper privilege management for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an information disclosure. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIntel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 contains an improper privilege management vulnerability in Ring 3 (user applications) that allows unprivileged authenticated users to access sensitive information they should not have access to. The vulnerability is exploitable via network access with low complexity and requires no user interaction or special internal knowledge.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.11001CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Intel Computing Improvement Program is installedOpen Windows Settings > Apps & Features (or run 'appwiz.cpl' and look for 'Intel(R) Computing Improvement Program' or similar Intel CIP entries)Affected if The software appears in the installed programs list
-
Find the installed version of Intel CIPRight-click the Intel CIP entry in Programs and Features, select 'Change' or 'Properties', or look for version information in the software's About/Help section. Alternatively, check the executable properties if you locate the program installation directory.Affected if You cannot locate the software or version information is unavailable
-
Compare installed version against vulnerable rangeCompare the found version number to the vulnerable threshold: any version below 2.4.11001 is affected. The vulnerable version format appears as a numeric build (e.g., versions like 2.4.x.x where x.x is below 11001).Affected if Installed version is a release earlier than WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 (e.g., 2.4.0.x where x is less than 11001, or any earlier major version)
-
Confirm the software is running and accessibleCheck if the Intel CIP service or application is currently running (open Task Manager, look for Intel CIP processes). Verify network accessibility if the software exposes network interfaces.Affected if The software is actively running and reachable on the network, as exploitation occurs via network access
You are affected if Intel(R) Computing Improvement Program is installed with a version number lower than 2.4.11001 and the software is running or accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.11001
Upgrade Intel(R) CIP software to version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 or later to remediate the improper privilege management vulnerability.
WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 or later
- Identify the current version of Intel(R) Computing Improvement Program (CIP) software installed on the system
- Download the updated Intel CIP software version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 or later from the official Intel support website
- Follow Intel's standard installation procedures to apply the update
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24863 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24863 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data