CVE-2025-2562
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient logging in the autotyping feature in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager on Windows allows an authenticated user to use a stored password without generating a corresponding log event, via the use of the autotyping functionality. This issue affects Remote Desktop Manager versions from 2025.1.24 through 2025.1.25, and all versions up to 2024.3.29.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe autotyping feature in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager on Windows fails to generate log events when authenticated users utilize stored passwords. This creates a security monitoring gap where credential usage via autotyping goes unrecorded in audit logs, potentially allowing malicious activity to go undetected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2024.3.31.0>= 2025.1.24.0, < 2025.1.26.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager is installedCheck for the application in the Windows installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Devolutions\Remote Desktop Manager) or look for the registry key at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\RemoteDesktopManager or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Devolutions\Remote Desktop ManagerAffected if The application is not found on the system, then this CVE does not apply
-
Determine the installed versionLocate the RemoteDesktopManager.exe file, right-click it, select Properties, and read the File Version from the Details tab. Alternatively, check the registry value at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Devolutions\Remote Desktop Manager\Version (or under the Uninstall registry key)Affected if The version is less than 2024.3.31.0, OR greater than or equal to 2025.1.24.0 but less than 2025.1.26.0
-
Confirm autotyping feature is configuredOpen Remote Desktop Manager, go to Tools > Options (or Settings) and look for the Autotyping or Entry settings. Check if automatic password typing is enabled for any saved connections. You can also examine the configuration file (typically in %APPDATA%\Devolutions\Remote Desktop Manager\Configs) for autotyping-related entriesAffected if Autotyping is enabled and being used with stored passwords, making the audit logging gap relevant to your environment
-
Verify audit logging captures autotyping eventsAccess the audit log viewer in Remote Desktop Manager (View > Audit Logs or similar). Search for events related to autotyping or credential auto-entry. Alternatively, check the log export location (usually in the Logs folder within the application data directory) for any autotyping-related entries when you use a saved password with autotypingAffected if No autotyping events appear in the audit logs despite using the autotyping feature, indicating the logging gap is present
You are affected if Remote Desktop Manager is installed with a version less than 2024.3.31.0 or between 2025.1.24.0 and 2025.1.25.0 inclusive, and the autotyping feature with stored passwords is being used without generating corresponding audit log entries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.3.31.02025.1.26.0
Upgrade to a version beyond 2025.1.25 that includes proper logging for autotyping functionality, or implement supplemental application monitoring to track autotyping events until a patch is available.
2025.1.26.0 or later (or 2024.3.31.0 or later for the 2024.x branch)
- 1. Open Remote Desktop Manager
- 2. Navigate to Help > Check for Updates (or About > Check for Updates)
- 3. If an update is available, download and install version 2025.1.26.0 or later
- 4. Alternatively, download the installer directly from the official Devolutions website (devolutions.net) for version 2025.1.26.0 or later
- 5. After installation, verify the version by going to Help > About to confirm the fix is applied
- 6. Test the autotyping feature to confirm logging now captures password usage events
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2562 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2562 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data