CVE-2025-2600
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper authorization in the variable component in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager on Windows allows an authenticated user to use the ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable even though not allowed by the "Allow password in variable policy". This issue affects Remote Desktop Manager versions from 2025.1.24 through 2025.1.25, and all versions up to 2024.3.29.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper authorization in Remote Desktop Manager allows authenticated users to bypass the 'Allow password in variable policy' and access the ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable despite being restricted from doing so. This is a broken access control issue where the policy check is not properly enforced for this specific variable component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2024.3.31.0>= 2025.1.24.0, < 2025.1.26.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Remote Desktop Manager versionOpen Remote Desktop Manager, go to Help > About or check the application version displayed on startup. Alternatively, check the installed program's properties in Windows Add/Remove Programs or the installation directory for a version file.Affected if The version is either below 2024.3.31.0 or falls within 2025.1.24.0 to 2025.1.25.0 inclusive.
-
Verify the 'Allow password in variable' policy configurationOpen Remote Desktop Manager administration settings or group policy configuration. Navigate to the security or variable policy section. Locate the 'Allow password in variable' policy setting and determine its current value (enabled or disabled).Affected if The policy is explicitly disabled or restricted, meaning users are supposed to be prevented from using passwords in variables.
-
Confirm access to ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable despite policy restrictionAs an authenticated user (non-administrator), attempt to create or edit a session entry using the ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable while the 'Allow password in variable' policy is disabled. Observe whether the application permits access to this variable despite the restriction.Affected if The user can access or use the ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable when the policy is configured to deny password-in-variable functionality.
A user is affected if their installed version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND they have configured the 'Allow password in variable' policy to restrict access, yet the ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable remains accessible due to the authorization bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.3.31.02025.1.26.0
Update to a version beyond 2025.1.25 (for 2025.x) or beyond 2024.3.29 (for 2024.x) to obtain the vendor patch that properly enforces the variable policy authorization.
2024.3.31.0 (for 2024.x users) or 2025.1.26.0 (for 2025.x users)
- 1. Open Remote Desktop Manager
- 2. Navigate to Help > Check for Updates (or check the Devolutions website for the latest version)
- 3. Download version 2024.3.31.0 or later for the 2024.x branch, OR version 2025.1.26.0 or later for the 2025.x branch
- 4. Install the updated version
- 5. Verify the fix by confirming the 'Allow password in variable policy' is properly enforced for the ELEVATED_PASSWORD variable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2600 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2600 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data