CVE-2025-2605
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Honeywell MB-Secure allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects MB-Secure: from V11.04 before V12.53 and MB-Secure PRO from V01.06 before V03.09.Honeywell also recommends updating to the most recent version of this product.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in Honeywell MB-Secure allows attackers to inject malicious OS commands through improper neutralization of special elements, leading to privilege abuse. This affects MB-Secure versions V11.04 through V12.52 and MB-Secure PRO versions V01.06 through V03.08.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.04, < 12.53>= 01.06, < 03.09CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed MB-Secure firmware versionLog into the MB-Secure web management interface and navigate to System > Status or System > Information to view the firmware version. Alternatively, check the firmware version displayed on the login page or in the system overview dashboard.Affected if The displayed version falls within the vulnerable ranges: V11.04 through V12.52 for MB-Secure, or V01.06 through V03.08 for MB-Secure PRO.
-
Confirm the firmware type (Standard or PRO)Verify whether your installation is MB-Secure Standard or MB-Secure PRO, as each has different version ranges. This information is typically visible in the system information page or the product licensing details within the web interface.Affected if You cannot distinguish between Standard and PRO variants, making it impossible to determine the correct vulnerable version range.
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed firmware version is: MB-Secure versions V11.04 through V12.52 (exclusive of V12.53), or MB-Secure PRO versions V01.06 through V03.08 (exclusive of V03.09).Affected if The installed version is greater than or equal to 11.04 and less than 12.53 for Standard, or greater than or equal to 01.06 and less than 03.09 for PRO.
-
Verify web management interface accessibilityDetermine if the MB-Secure web management interface is accessible from the network. The command injection vulnerability is exploitable through the web interface. Check if port 80/443 or the configured web service port is exposed.Affected if The web interface is accessible and the firmware version falls within the affected ranges listed above.
You are affected if your MB-Secure firmware version is V11.04 through V12.52 (Standard) or V01.06 through V03.08 (PRO) and the web management interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped03.0912.53
Update MB-Secure to V12.53 or later and MB-Secure PRO to V03.09 or later per vendor recommendations. Apply in a staging environment first to verify compatibility.
Mb Secure Firmware: >=12.53 | Mb Secure Pro Firmware: >=03.09
- Identify the current installed version of MB-Secure or MB-Secure Pro firmware
- For Mb Secure Firmware: Upgrade to version 12.53 or later
- For Mb Secure Pro Firmware: Upgrade to version 03.09 or later
- After upgrade, verify the system is functioning correctly and the vulnerability is resolved
- Consult Honeywell documentation for any specific upgrade procedures or prerequisites
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2605 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2605 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data