CVE-2025-27480
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in the Remote Desktop Gateway Service that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve code execution. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management where memory is accessed after being freed, leading to potential arbitrary code execution in the context of the service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2< 10.0.14393.7969< 10.0.17763.7136< 10.0.20348.3453< 10.0.25398.1551< 10.0.26100.3775CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Remote Desktop Gateway service presenceOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'Get-Service -Name TermService' and check if the Remote Desktop Gateway service ( TERMSERVICE) is installed and running. Also check for the 'Remote Desktop Gateway' role via Server Manager or 'Get-WindowsFeature RDS-Gateway'.Affected if The Remote Desktop Gateway service or role is installed/enabled on the system.
-
Check Windows Server versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' or query the registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion to obtain the full build number.Affected if The installed version falls outside the fixed builds: Server 2012 (any version), Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.7969, Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.7136, Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.3453, Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1551, or Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.3775.
-
Confirm RD Gateway listener is activeRun 'netsh routing ip http show interface' or check registry at HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\TermService\Parameters\ServiceDll to verify the Terminal Services (TermService) DLL is loaded. Use 'netstat -ano | findstr :443' to check if port 443 (default RD Gateway port) is listening.Affected if The RD Gateway service is listening on network ports, exposing the vulnerability to remote attackers.
The system is affected if it runs any of the unpatched Windows Server versions listed AND has Remote Desktop Gateway service or role enabled and exposed on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.796910.0.17763.713610.0.20348.3453
Apply the relevant Microsoft security patch for CVE-2025-27480 to all affected Windows systems running Remote Desktop Gateway. Until patches are applied, restrict network access to RDP Gateway ports (default 443) to trusted sources only.
Windows Server 2016 to build 10.0.14393.7969 | Windows Server 2019 to build 10.0.17763.7136 | Windows Server 2022 to build 10.0.20348.3453 | Windows Server 2022 23h2 to build 10.0.25398.1551 | Windows Server 2025 to build 10.0.26100.3775 | Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 to a supported version such as W
- Identify the current Windows Server build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- For Windows Server 2016: Apply the March 2025 or later Windows Update to reach build 10.0.14393.7969
- For Windows Server 2019: Apply the March 2025 or later Windows Update to reach build 10.0.17763.7136
- For Windows Server 2022: Apply the March 2025 or later Windows Update to reach build 10.0.20348.3453
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: Apply the March 2025 or later Windows Update to reach build 10.0.25398.1551
- For Windows Server 2025: Apply the March 2025 or later Windows Update to reach build 10.0.26100.3775
- For Windows Server 2012/2012 R2: Upgrade to a supported Windows Server version as these releases are end-of-life with no security updates
- Verify the update was applied by checking the build number in Windows Update history
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27480 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27480 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data