CVE-2025-27924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNintex Automation 5.6 and 5.7 before 5.8 has a stored XSS issue associated with the "Navigate to a URL" action.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNintex Automation versions 5.6 and 5.7 before 5.8 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the 'Navigate to a URL' action. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into the URL parameter, which is then stored and executed when other users interact with the affected workflow action.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.6, < 5.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Nintex Automation versionAccess the Nintex Automation admin console or About page to determine the exact version number installed in your environmentAffected if The installed version is 5.6, 5.7, or any version >= 5.6 but < 5.8
-
Identify workflows using the 'Navigate to a URL' actionSearch your workflow repository or use the Nintex workflow discovery feature to locate all workflows that contain the 'Navigate to a URL' actionAffected if Any workflows exist that use this action, making them potential carriers of the stored XSS payload
-
Inspect URL parameter values in affected workflowsOpen each workflow containing the 'Navigate to a URL' action and examine the configured URL parameter for any unexpected or malicious-looking characters, script tags, or encoded payloadsAffected if The URL parameter contains unsanitized user-supplied input or appears to contain script injection attempts
-
Review workflow execution history for suspicious activityCheck workflow audit logs and execution history for entries involving the 'Navigate to a URL' action that show unusual URL patterns or repeated executionsAffected if Historical executions show URLs containing JavaScript handlers or unusual patterns consistent with XSS payloads
-
Check for unexpected content in workflow definitionsExport or examine the raw workflow definition files (XML or JSON format depending on your Nintex version) and search for script tags or javascript: URIs within URL parameter fieldsAffected if Workflow definitions contain encoded or plain-text script injections in URL fields
You are affected if your Nintex Automation version is 5.6 or 5.7 (or any version >= 5.6 but < 5.8) and you have workflows using the 'Navigate to a URL' action with untrusted URL parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.8
Upgrade Nintex Automation to version 5.8 or later. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation for URL parameters in workflow actions to prevent XSS exploitation.
Nintex Automation 5.8
- Back up the Nintex Automation installation and database before proceeding
- Review the Nintex Automation 5.8 release notes for any changes or migration requirements
- Download Nintex Automation version 5.8 from the official Nintex download portal
- Apply the upgrade following the standard Nintex upgrade documentation for your deployment type
- After upgrading, verify that the stored XSS vulnerability in the 'Navigate to a URL' action has been resolved by testing the action with appropriate input validation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data