AutomationApplication · Nintex

CVE-2025-27925

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.8 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Nintex Automation 5.6 and 5.7 before 5.8 has insecure deserialization of user input.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Nintex Automation versions 5.6 and 5.7 before version 5.8 contain an insecure deserialization vulnerability where user-supplied data is deserialized without proper validation, potentially allowing remote code execution.

MitigationUpgrade Nintex Automation to version 5.8 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, network segmentation and input validation at perimeter layers may provide temporary risk reduction.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AutomationApplication
Affected:>= 5.6, < 5.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Nintex Automation version
    Access the Nintex Automation admin console or check the product's About/Version information page. This is typically found under Help > About or in the system administration settings. Alternatively, check any installation manifests or license files that may contain the version number.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.6.x or 5.7.x
  2. Confirm version falls within affected range
    Compare your identified version against the vulnerable range: versions 5.6.0 through 5.7.x (any minor version) are affected. Version 5.8 or later is not vulnerable.
    Affected if Version is greater than or equal to 5.6.0 and less than 5.8.0
  3. Verify product is exposed to network
    Determine if the Nintex Automation web interface is accessible from the network or internet. Check firewall rules, load balancer configurations, or IIS/Apache bindings that expose the application.
    Affected if The Nintex Automation interface is network-accessible (especially unauthenticated or weakly authenticated access increases exposure)

You are affected if Nintex Automation version 5.6.x or 5.7.x is installed and the product interface is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.8 or later
Fixed in 5.8
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Nintex Automation to version 5.8 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, network segmentation and input validation at perimeter layers may provide temporary risk reduction.

Recommended fix High confidence

5.8

  1. Back up the current Nintex Automation installation and database before beginning any upgrade process
  2. Review the official Nintex upgrade documentation at help.nintex.com for version 5.8 to understand prerequisites and requirements
  3. Download Nintex Automation version 5.8 from the official Nintex portal or distribution channel
  4. Execute the upgrade following the documented upgrade procedure for your deployment model (cloud-hosted or on-premises)
  5. After upgrade completion, verify the Nintex Automation services are running correctly
  6. Confirm the version number displays as 5.8 in the Nintex Administration interface

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Automation Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27925 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data