CVE-2025-2861
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSaTECH BCU in its firmware version 2.1.3 uses the HTTP protocol. The use of the HTTP protocol for web browsing has the problem that information is exchanged in unencrypted text. Since sensitive data such as credentials are exchanged, an attacker could obtain them and log in legitimately.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSaTECH BCU firmware version 2.1.3 transmits all web traffic over unencrypted HTTP, allowing network attackers to intercept sensitive data including user credentials in plain text.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device firmware versionAccess the SaTECH BCU device admin interface or check the device documentation for firmware version information. Common methods include: logging into the web interface and checking the 'About' or 'System Information' page, or using the device's CLI if available with a command like 'show version' or 'firmware version'.Affected if The firmware version displayed is exactly 2.1.3
-
Verify the web protocol in useExamine the URL in the browser address bar when accessing the SaTECH BCU web interface. Check if it starts with 'http://' (unencrypted) rather than 'https://' (encrypted).Affected if The web interface is accessible over http:// and not https://
-
Capture network traffic to check for unencrypted credentialsUse a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the network segment between the client and the SaTECH BCU device. Initiate a login to the web interface and examine the captured packets for the login POST request.Affected if Login credentials are transmitted in plain text within HTTP traffic without TLS encryption
You are affected if your SaTECH BCU device runs firmware version 2.1.3 and the web interface is accessible over unencrypted HTTP, allowing your login credentials to be intercepted in plain text.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement TLS/SSL encryption (HTTPS) to protect all web communications and ensure sensitive data is transmitted securely.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2861 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2861 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data