CVE-2025-2862
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSaTECH BCU, in its firmware version 2.1.3, performs weak password encryption. This allows an attacker with access to the device's system or website to obtain the credentials, as the storage methods used are not strong enough in terms of encryption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSaTECH BCU firmware 2.1.3 implements insufficient encryption for storing user credentials, allowing an attacker with access to the device system or web interface to recover plaintext passwords from the weak encrypted storage.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify firmware versionLog into the device web interface or CLI and locate the firmware version (often under System Information, About, or a 'show version' command).Affected if The installed firmware version is exactly 2.1.3.
-
Confirm user management is enabledIn the web UI, go to the User Management page, or on the CLI run a command to list user accounts (e.g., 'show users' or similar). Verify that at least one user account exists.Affected if User accounts are present on the device, meaning credential storage is active.
-
Find password storage locationSearch the device's file system or configuration for files that store user credentials (commonly named something like user config, passwd, or a database file).Affected if A file or database containing user credentials is found on the device.
-
Inspect password encryption methodOpen the credential storage file and examine the password field. Determine if the passwords are stored as hashed values (e.g., long random strings) or as reversible encrypted strings (e.g., base64, XOR, simple cipher).Affected if Passwords are stored in a reversible (weak) format rather than a strong salted hash.
The device is affected if it runs firmware version 2.1.3 and stores user credentials using weak reversible encryption.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace weak encryption with a strong password hashing algorithm (e.g., bcrypt, Argon2, or PBKDF2) with per-password salt, or obtain and deploy a patched firmware version from the vendor.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-2862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-2862 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data