CVE-2025-29828
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing release of memory after effective lifetime in Windows Cryptographic Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory leak vulnerability exists in Windows Cryptographic Services where memory is not properly released after its effective lifetime. This memory corruption can be exploited by an unauthorized remote attacker to execute arbitrary code over a network, potentially leading to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.22621.5472< 10.0.22631.5472< 10.0.26100.4270< 10.0.20348.3745< 10.0.25398.1665< 10.0.26100.4270CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionRun 'winver' from command prompt or 'systeminfo' and look at the OS Build number field, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion | Select-Object CurrentBuild,DisplayVersion,UBR' in PowerShellAffected if The build number is lower than the fixed version for your Windows edition (22h2: <22621.5472, 23h2: <22631.5472, 24h2: <26100.4270, Server 2022: <20348.3745, Server 2022 23h2: <25398.1665, Server 2025: <26100.4270)
-
Identify exact Windows edition and versionRun 'winver' or check System Properties to confirm whether you are on Windows 11 22h2, 23h2, 24h2, Windows Server 2022, Server 2022 23h2, or Server 2025Affected if The detected edition matches one of the affected products but the build version is below the corresponding fixed version
-
Verify Cryptographic Services statusOpen Services console (services.msc) and check if 'Cryptographic Services' service is running, or run 'Get-Service CryptSvc' in PowerShellAffected if The service is running and the build version is below the fixed threshold - the vulnerability exists in this component
You are affected if your Windows build number is below the fixed version for your specific Windows edition and the Cryptographic Services service is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.20348.374510.0.22621.547210.0.22631.5472
Apply the relevant Microsoft security patches for Windows Cryptographic Services once released. Prioritize patching systems exposed to network attack vectors given the remote code execution capability.
Windows 11 22h2: build 10.0.22621.5472 or later | Windows 11 23h2: build 10.0.22631.5472 or later | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.4270 or later | Windows Server 2022: build 10.0.20348.3745 or later | Windows Server 2022 23h2: build 10.0.25398.1665 or later | Windows Server 2025: build 10.0.26100
- Check current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'
- Open Settings > Windows Update > Check for updates, or manually download the security update from the Microsoft Update Catalog (search for CVE-2025-29828)
- Install the cumulative security update for your Windows version
- Restart the system when prompted
- Verify the installation by checking the Windows version matches or exceeds: Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.5472, Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.5472, Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.4270, Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.3745, Windows Server 2022 23h2: 10.0.25398.1665, Windows Server 2025: 10.0.26100.4270
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-29828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-29828 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data