ClininetApplication · Cgm

CVE-2025-30042

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2025.ms2 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The CGM CLININET system provides smart card authentication; however, authentication is conducted locally on the client device, and, in reality, only the certificate number is used for access verification. As a result, possession of the certificate number alone is sufficient for authentication, regardless of the actual presence of the smart card or ownership of the private key.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The CGM CLININET system's smart card authentication is fundamentally broken. Authentication occurs locally on the client device and only validates the certificate number, not the actual smart card or private key. This allows authentication bypass using only a certificate number without possessing the physical smart card or the corresponding private key.

MitigationRedesign the authentication to perform server-side validation of the actual smart card and private key, not just the certificate number. Implement proper cryptographic challenge-response verification that proves possession of the private key.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ClininetApplication
Affected:< 2025.ms2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed CGM Clininet version
    Locate the CGM Clininet application in your system and check its version number (typically found in the application properties, about screen, or installed programs list)
    Affected if The version is lower than 2025.ms2 (for example, 2025.ms1, 2024.x, or earlier)
  2. Determine if smart card authentication is configured
    Review the CGM Clininet authentication settings or configuration files to verify whether smart card authentication has been enabled for user logins
    Affected if Smart card authentication is enabled in the CGM Clininet configuration
  3. Verify authentication validation location
    Examine the authentication workflow or logs to determine whether certificate validation occurs locally on the client device or is performed server-side
    Affected if Authentication validates only the certificate number locally without requiring server-side proof of private key possession (such as challenge-response verification)

You are affected if CGM Clininet version is below 2025.ms2 AND smart card authentication is enabled with client-side-only certificate number validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2025.ms2 or later
Fixed in 2025.ms2
Interim mitigation

Redesign the authentication to perform server-side validation of the actual smart card and private key, not just the certificate number. Implement proper cryptographic challenge-response verification that proves possession of the private key.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

2025.ms2

  1. Verify current CGM CLININET version is below 2025.ms2
  2. Obtain the updated CGM CLININET version 2025.ms2 from official CGM vendor sources (www.cgm.com or authorized distributors)
  3. Apply the upgrade following vendor-provided installation instructions
  4. After upgrade, verify that authentication now properly validates smart card and private key presence rather than relying solely on certificate number
Caveat Review vendor release notes for version 2025.ms2 to check for any breaking changes or required configuration adjustments

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Clininet Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
52.0 hours of engineering $9,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30042 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30042 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data