CVE-2025-58402
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe CGM CLININET application uses direct, sequential object identifiers "MessageID" without proper authorization checks. By modifying the parameter in the GET request, an attacker can access messages and attachments belonging to other users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCGM CLININET application has an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability where MessageID parameters in GET requests use sequential, predictable identifiers without verifying that the authenticated user owns or has permission to access the requested message. An attacker with valid credentials can enumerate MessageID values to access other users' messages and attachments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.ms4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CGM Clininet installationLocate the CGM Clininet application in your environment and identify its version number, typically found in the application metadata, about page, or installation directory.Affected if The application is installed and version is below 2025.ms4
-
Identify message module usageDetermine if the message/notification functionality is enabled and accessible to users by reviewing application modules, user roles, and feature toggles.Affected if The message module is active and users have access to retrieve messages via GET requests
-
Check message endpoint behaviorWith valid credentials, observe the message retrieval endpoint and identify whether MessageID parameters use sequential numeric values in GET requests (e.g., /messages?id=1, /messages?id=2).Affected if MessageIDs are sequential integers that increment predictably
-
Verify authorization enforcementAttempt to access a message belonging to a different user by modifying the MessageID parameter in a GET request while authenticated as your own account, without receiving an authorization error.Affected if The application returns message content for IDs you did not create without verifying ownership
-
Test attachment access patternIf attachments are stored with sequential IDs, attempt to access an attachment linked to another user's message by changing the attachment ID.Affected if Attachments are accessible via predictable IDs without ownership verification
Your environment is affected if CGM Clininet version is below 2025.ms4 and the message retrieval feature permits access to other users' messages through predictable sequential MessageID parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.ms4
Implement proper object-level authorization checks on all message retrieval endpoints to verify the authenticated user owns or is authorized to access the requested MessageID. Consider replacing sequential IDs with non-predictable indirect references.
2025.ms4
- Identify the current CGM CLININET version installed in your environment
- Perform a full backup of all databases, configurations, and message attachments
- Upgrade the CGM CLININET application to version 2025.ms4 or later
- After upgrade, verify that the MessageID parameter now requires proper authorization
- Confirm that sequential/guessable MessageIDs no longer grant unauthorized access to other users' messages and attachments
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58402 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58402 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data