CVE-2025-30394
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSensitive data storage in improperly locked memory in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in Remote Desktop Gateway Service involves sensitive data being stored in improperly locked memory, which can be exploited by an unauthorized network attacker to cause a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8066< 10.0.17763.7314< 10.0.20348.3692< 10.0.25398.1611< 10.0.26100.4061CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows Server versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact Windows Server build numberAffected if The build number falls within any of the affected ranges: Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.8066, Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.7314, Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.3692, Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1611, Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.4061, or is Server 2012/R2 (all versions)
-
Confirm Remote Desktop Gateway is installedOpen Services.msc or run 'Get-Service -Name UiPath' - actually check via 'Get-Service' for 'Remote Desktop Gateway' service name, or check for Rdgws.dll presence in systemAffected if The Remote Desktop Gateway service (RdGateway) is present on the system
-
Verify Remote Desktop Gateway service statusRun 'Get-Service -Name RemoteDesktopGatewayServices' or check service 'Remote Desktop Gateway' in Services list to see if it is running or set to startAffected if The Remote Desktop Gateway service is installed and enabled (running or set to auto-start)
-
Check network exposure of RD GatewayReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if TCP port 443 (default RD Gateway port) is open to untrusted networks, or run 'netsh advfirewall firewall show rule name=all' and search for RemoteDesktopGateway rulesAffected if The RD Gateway service port (typically 443) is accessible from untrusted or external networks
A system is likely affected if it runs an affected Windows Server version, has Remote Desktop Gateway installed/enabled, and has the service port exposed to untrusted networks, allowing unauthorized network attackers to trigger the denial of service condition.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.806610.0.17763.731410.0.20348.3692
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-30394 when available, and ensure Remote Desktop Gateway services are not exposed directly to untrusted networks.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed build for your respective Windows Server version (e.g., Server 2022 build 10.0.20348.3692 or later)
- Identify the current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' commands
- For Windows Server 2016: Upgrade to build 10.0.14393.8066 or later
- For Windows Server 2019: Upgrade to build 10.0.17763.7314 or later
- For Windows Server 2022: Upgrade to build 10.0.20348.3692 or later
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.25398.1611 or later
- For Windows Server 2025: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.4061 or later
- Apply the corresponding Windows Update or download the specific KB from Microsoft Update Catalog
- Reboot the server after applying the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30394 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30394 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data