Circuit Design SuiteApplication · Ni

CVE-2025-30418

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 14.3.1 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out of bounds write in CheckPins() when using the SymbolEditor in NI Circuit Design Suite.  This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .sym file. This vulnerability affects NI Circuit Design Suite 14.3.0 and prior versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the CheckPins() function within the SymbolEditor component of NI Circuit Design Suite. The flaw is caused by an out-of-bounds write when processing specially crafted .sym files. Successful exploitation can lead to information disclosure or arbitrary code execution.

MitigationApply the vendor patch when released and implement controls to prevent users from opening untrusted .sym files until the update is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Circuit Design SuiteApplication
Affected:< 14.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm NI Circuit Design Suite installation
    Check system for installed NI Circuit Design Suite software. Look for National Instruments or NI Circuit Design Suite in installed programs list via Control Panel or system inventory tools.
    Affected if NI Circuit Design Suite is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the NI Circuit Design Suite installation and determine the exact version number. This is typically found in the software's About section, registry entries under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\National Instruments, or the program's executable properties.
    Affected if Installed version is lower than 14.3.1 (e.g., 14.0, 14.1, 14.2, or any version below 14.3.1)
  3. Verify SymbolEditor component presence
    Confirm the SymbolEditor component is available. This component is part of the suite and handles .sym file processing. Check for symbol editor related executables or DLLs in the NI installation directory.
    Affected if SymbolEditor component exists and can process .sym files
  4. Check for .sym file handling capability
    Determine whether the software can open or process .sym symbol library files. This is the attack vector - users must be able to load specially crafted .sym files into the SymbolEditor.
    Affected if Users can open .sym files through the SymbolEditor component

User is affected if NI Circuit Design Suite version 14.3.1 or higher is NOT installed AND the SymbolEditor can process .sym files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 14.3.1 or later
Fixed in 14.3.1
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch when released and implement controls to prevent users from opening untrusted .sym files until the update is available.

Recommended fix High confidence

NI Circuit Design Suite 14.3.1

  1. Upgrade NI Circuit Design Suite to version 14.3.1 or later
  2. Verify the upgrade by checking Help > About in the application
  3. Exercise caution when opening .sym files from untrusted sources
  4. Consider implementing file validation policies for .sym files in your organization

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Circuit Design Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30418 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30418 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data