CVE-2025-30420
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out of bounds read in Bitmap::InternalDraw() when using the SymbolEditor in NI Circuit Design Suite. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .sym file. This vulnerability affects NI Circuit Design Suite 14.3.0 and prior versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in Bitmap::InternalDraw() within NI Circuit Design Suite's SymbolEditor component. The vulnerability is triggered when parsing specially crafted .sym files containing malicious bitmap data, leading to memory corruption that can result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 14.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NI Circuit Design Suite installationCheck the installed programs list in Windows Control Panel or use 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion' in PowerShell to list installed software and versionsAffected if NI Circuit Design Suite appears in the installed programs list
-
Confirm the installed version numberLocate the version of NI Circuit Design Suite from the program list or check the program's About/Help section; compare the version number against 14.3.1Affected if The installed version is below 14.3.1 (for example, 14.0, 14.1, 14.2, or any version prior to 14.3.1)
-
Identify SymbolEditor component usageCheck if the SymbolEditor component is accessible by looking for SymbolEditor.exe or related .sym file handling functionality within the NI Circuit Design Suite installation directoryAffected if SymbolEditor component is present and functional within the installed version
-
Determine exposure to .sym file parsingReview whether users in the environment have the ability to open or import .sym files through the SymbolEditor; check for recent .sym file access logs or user workflows involving .sym filesAffected if Users can or do open .sym files using the SymbolEditor component
A user is affected if NI Circuit Design Suite is installed with a version lower than 14.3.1 and the SymbolEditor component is used to open .sym files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.3.1
Users should avoid opening .sym files from untrusted sources. Organizations should update to a patched version of NI Circuit Design Suite once available, or implement file sanitization/validation policies for .sym files.
NI Circuit Design Suite 14.3.1
- 1. Close any running instances of NI Circuit Design Suite
- 2. Back up any existing projects and custom symbol files (.sym)
- 3. Download NI Circuit Design Suite version 14.3.1 or later from the official NI website (www.ni.com)
- 4. Run the installer with administrator privileges
- 5. Follow the installation wizard prompts to complete the upgrade
- 6. After installation, verify the installed version matches 14.3.1 or later
- 7. Do not open any untrusted .sym files received from external sources
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,248.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-30420 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-30420 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data