CVE-2025-31366
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiSASE 25.2.a may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a reflected cross site scripting (XSS) via crafted HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (CWE-79) in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSASE allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted HTTP requests due to improper input neutralization during web page generation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.4.9>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.4>= 7.0.0, < 7.6.4= 25.3.40CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Fortinet product and versionRun CLI command 'get system status' or access the web GUI and check System > Settings > About. Confirm whether the device is FortiOS, FortiProxy, or FortiSASE and note the exact version number.Affected if The product version falls within FortiOS >= 6.4.0 and < 7.4.9 OR FortiOS >= 7.6.0 and < 7.6.4 OR FortiProxy >= 7.0.0 and < 7.6.4 OR FortiSASE version 25.3.40.
-
Verify web interface is enabledIn the web GUI, go to System > Settings > Administration Settings. Check if 'HTTPS server' is enabled. Alternatively, from CLI run 'get system interface' to list enabled interfaces and verify HTTP/HTTPS access is permitted.Affected if The administrative web interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is accessible to users on any network segment.
-
Confirm administrative access is not restrictedReview the administrative access settings on each interface ( wan1, wan2, internal, etc.) via CLI: 'show system interface' or via GUI: Network > Interfaces. Determine if management access is open to untrusted networks.Affected if The web interface is reachable from untrusted networks (such as the internet) without IP restriction.
You are affected if your FortiOS, FortiProxy, or FortiSASE version is within the affected ranges AND the web administrative interface is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.97.6.4
Apply available vendor patches for affected FortiOS (7.0-7.6.3), FortiProxy (7.0-7.6.3), and FortiSASE versions. Until patched, consider restricting access to affected web interfaces or implementing WAF rules to filter malicious request patterns.
FortiOS 7.4.9+ (or 7.6.4+ depending on branch); FortiProxy 7.6.4+; FortiSASE 25.3.41+
- Identify current FortiOS, FortiProxy, or FortiSASE version using: get system status or fortios -i version
- For FortiOS 7.4.x users: Upgrade to FortiOS 7.4.9 or later
- For FortiOS 7.6.x users: Upgrade to FortiOS 7.6.4 or later
- For FortiOS 6.4.x, 7.0.x, 7.2.x users: Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for your branch (7.4.9 for 7.4 branch, 7.6.4 for 7.6 branch) - note: older branches may require intermediate upgrades
- For FortiProxy 7.x users: Upgrade to FortiProxy 7.6.4 or later
- For FortiSASE 25.3.40 users: Upgrade to FortiSASE 25.3.41 or later (or the next available stable release)
- After upgrade, verify the fix using: execute diagnose debug application httpsd -1 to confirm no XSS-related errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-31366 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-31366 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data