CVE-2025-34216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 22.0.1026 and Application prior to version 20.0.2702 (VA deployments only) expose a set of unauthenticated REST API endpoints that return configuration files and clear‑text passwords. The same endpoints also disclose the Laravel APP_KEY used for cryptographic signing. Because the APP_KEY is required to generate valid signed requests, an attacker who obtains it can craft malicious payloads that are accepted by the application and achieve remote code execution on the appliance. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-018 — RCE & Leaks via API.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVasion Print Virtual Appliance exposes unauthenticated REST API endpoints that leak configuration files, clear-text passwords, and the Laravel APP_KEY. The exposed APP_KEY allows attackers to forge valid signed requests, enabling remote code execution on the appliance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.0.2702< 22.0.1026CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Vasion Virtual Appliance Application versionAccess the appliance admin interface or check /opt/vasion/version file (or similar version file in the installation directory) to determine the installed Application versionAffected if Version is below 20.0.2702 (e.g., 20.0.x where x < 2702, or any earlier major version)
-
Check Vasion Virtual Appliance Host versionAccess the appliance hypervisor console or check the host system package version (e.g., via 'rpm -q vasion-host' or 'dpkg -l vasion-host' depending on OS) to determine the Host versionAffected if Version is below 22.0.1026 (e.g., 22.0.x where x < 1026, or any earlier major version)
-
Test unauthenticated API endpoint accessibilityFrom an external host, attempt HTTP GET requests to common Vasion REST API paths such as /api/v1/config, /api/config, /api/settings, or /api/v1/settings without providing any authentication credentialsAffected if The endpoints respond with HTTP 200 OK and return JSON data containing configuration files, passwords, or APP_KEY without requiring authentication
-
Inspect response for exposed APP_KEYIf the API endpoints respond, examine the JSON body for a field named 'APP_KEY', 'app_key', or 'key' containing a base64-encoded 32-byte value (typically 64 characters)Affected if The API response contains a valid Laravel APP_KEY value that could be used to forge signed requests
-
Verify clear-text password exposureSearch the API response for password fields (e.g., 'password', 'db_password', 'smtp_password') that contain readable plain-text passwords rather than hashed or masked valuesAffected if The API responses expose passwords in plain text that should not be accessible without authentication
You are affected if either your Vasion Virtual Appliance Application version is below 20.0.2702 or your Host version is below 22.0.1026, AND the unauthenticated API endpoints are accessible and leaking the APP_KEY or other sensitive configuration data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.0.270222.0.1026
Upgrade Vasion Print Virtual Appliance Host to version 22.0.1026 or Application to version 20.0.2702 (or later) to patch the vulnerable unauthenticated API endpoints.
Virtual Appliance Application: 20.0.2702 | Virtual Appliance Host: 22.0.1026
- Identify the current version of the Virtual Appliance Application and Virtual Appliance Host installations
- Upgrade Virtual Appliance Application to version 20.0.2702 or later
- Upgrade Virtual Appliance Host to version 22.0.1026 or later
- After upgrade, verify the REST API endpoints now require authentication and that the APP_KEY is no longer exposed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data