CVE-2025-34218
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 22.0.1049 and Application prior to version 20.0.2786 (VA/SaaS deployments) expose internal Docker containers through the gw Docker instance. The gateway publishes a /meta endpoint which lists every micro‑service container together with version information. These containers are reachable directly over HTTP/HTTPS without any access‑control list (ACL), authentication or rate‑limiting. Consequently, any attacker on the LAN or the Internet can enumerate all internal services and their versions, interact with the exposed APIs of each microservice as an unauthenticated user, or issue malicious requests that may lead to information disclosure, privilege escalation within the container, or denial‑of‑service of the entire appliance. The root cause is the absence of authentication and network‑level restrictions on the API‑gateway’s proxy to internal Docker containers, effectively turning the internal service mesh into a public attack surface. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-030 — Exposed Internal Docker Instance (LAN).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVasion Print Virtual Appliance exposes internal Docker containers through the gw Docker instance's /meta endpoint without authentication, ACLs, or rate-limiting. Attackers can enumerate all microservices and versions, interact with unauthenticated APIs, and potentially achieve information disclosure, privilege escalation, or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.0.2786< 22.0.1049CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Vasion Virtual Appliance Application versionLocate and inspect the installed Vasion Virtual Appliance Application version using the product's admin interface, system information page, or version lookup command provided by the applianceAffected if The installed Application version is below 20.0.2786
-
Check Vasion Virtual Appliance Host versionLocate and inspect the Vasion Virtual Appliance Host version through the hypervisor, system utilities, or appliance management consoleAffected if The installed Host version is below 22.0.1049
-
Test accessibility of the /meta endpointAttempt to access the /meta endpoint on the gw Docker instance gateway using HTTP or HTTPS (e.g., http://<appliance-ip>/meta or the Docker gateway IP on port 80/443)Affected if The /meta endpoint returns a listing of microservices with version information without requiring authentication
-
Verify direct access to internal Docker containersAttempt to access internal microservice containers directly over HTTP/HTTPS using their Docker network IPs or host ports without any authentication, ACL, or rate-limitingAffected if Internal Docker containers are reachable directly without any authentication or access controls
The environment is affected if either the Application version is below 20.0.2786 or the Host version is below 22.0.1049, and the /meta endpoint or internal Docker containers are accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.0.278622.0.1049
Upgrade to version 22.0.1049 (Virtual Appliance) or 20.0.2786 (Application), and implement network-level access controls and authentication on the API gateway proxy to internal containers.
Virtual Appliance Application: 20.0.2786 or later; Virtual Appliance Host: 22.0.1049 or later
- Identify which Virtual Appliance components are deployed: Application, Host, or both
- For Virtual Appliance Application: upgrade to version 20.0.2786 or later
- For Virtual Appliance Host: upgrade to version 22.0.1049 or later
- After upgrading, verify the /meta endpoint is no longer publicly accessible
- Verify internal Docker containers are no longer reachable directly without authentication
- Confirm that API gateway now properly enforces access controls on proxied internal services
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34218 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34218 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data