Webaccess\/vpnApplication · Advantech

CVE-2025-34236

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.1.5 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Advantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via NetworksController.addNetworkAction(). Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Advantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the NetworksController.addNetworkAction() function. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input, allowing an attacker to inject malicious script that executes in the context of a victim's browser.

MitigationUpgrade to version 1.1.5 or later. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the NetworksController to prevent XSS injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Webaccess\/vpnApplication
Affected:< 1.1.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Advantech WebAccess/VPN is running
    Locate the WebAccess/VPN application process or service. Check for running processes, installed services, or access the web interface on the default ports (typically 443 or 8080).
    Affected if The product is present and accessible on the system.
  2. Determine the installed version
    Access the web interface and navigate to the About or System Information page, or check the application binaries/CHANGELOG for the version number. Compare against 1.1.5.
    Affected if The installed version is prior to 1.1.5.
  3. Verify NetworksController component exists
    Locate the WebAccess/VPN installation directory and verify the presence of the NetworksController file/module that contains the addNetworkAction() function.
    Affected if The NetworksController with addNetworkAction() function is present in the installation.
  4. Check for user input acceptance in network configuration
    Access the network configuration or add network action functionality within the web interface. Identify any input fields that accept user-supplied data for network settings.
    Affected if User-supplied input is accepted without visible sanitization in the network add/action forms.

A user is affected if Advantech WebAccess/VPN version is prior to 1.1.5 and the NetworksController.addNetworkAction() function is accessible and accepts unsanitized user input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.1.5 or later
Fixed in 1.1.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to version 1.1.5 or later. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the NetworksController to prevent XSS injection.

Recommended fix High confidence

WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5

  1. Upgrade Advantech WebAccess/VPN to version 1.1.5 or later to resolve the stored XSS vulnerability in NetworksController.addNetworkAction()

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Webaccess\/vpn Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34236 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34236 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data