CVE-2025-34237
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdvantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via StandaloneVpnClientsController.addStandaloneVpnClientAction(). Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdvantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the StandaloneVpnClientsController.addStandaloneVpnClientAction() function. The application fails to properly validate or escape user-supplied input, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts that persist and execute in victims' browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed WebAccess/VPN versionLocate the WebAccess/VPN installation and check the version information, typically found in the application GUI, installer properties, or installation directory metadataAffected if The installed version is any release prior to 1.1.5
-
Verify presence of VPN client management moduleCheck if the StandaloneVpnClientsController component exists in the WebAccess/VPN installation, typically found in the application's controller or module directoryAffected if The addStandaloneVpnClientAction function is present in the application
-
Confirm access to VPN client addition interfaceDetermine if the web interface includes functionality to add standalone VPN clients - this is the entry point where the vulnerable function processes inputAffected if Users with access to add VPN clients can submit input to the application
-
Inspect VPN client input handlingExamine the application's handling of VPN client input fields (such as client name, IP address, or description fields) to see if input validation or encoding is applied before storageAffected if Input fields for VPN client creation lack proper validation or output encoding mechanisms
The environment is affected if WebAccess/VPN version is below 1.1.5 AND the VPN client management feature is accessible to users, since the stored XSS vulnerability exists in the addStandaloneVpnClientAction function that processes client input without proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.5
Upgrade to WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5 or later. Additionally, implement proper input validation and output encoding for the VPN client input fields to prevent XSS.
WebAccess/VPN 1.1.5
- 1. Identify all deployments of Advantech WebAccess/VPN in your environment
- 2. Verify current installed version using the system administration interface or command line tools
- 3. Obtain WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5 or later from the official Advantech download repository (icr.advantech.com)
- 4. Before upgrading, back up the current configuration and any critical data
- 5. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is correctly installed
- 7. Test the addStandaloneVpnClientAction functionality to confirm XSS input is properly validated/escaped
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34237 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34237 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data