CVE-2025-34238
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdvantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain an absolute path traversal via AjaxStandaloneVpnClientsController.ajaxDownloadRoadWarriorConfigFileAction() that allows an authenticated network administrator to cause the application to read and return the contents of arbitrary files the web user (www-data) can access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdvantech WebAccess/VPN versions before 1.1.5 contain an absolute path traversal vulnerability in the AjaxStandaloneVpnClientsController.ajaxDownloadRoadWarriorConfigFileAction() method. An authenticated network administrator can manipulate the file path parameter to read arbitrary files accessible to the web server process (www-data), potentially exposing sensitive system files or configuration data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Advantech WebAccess/VPN installationLocate the WebAccess/VPN application on the system. Common installation paths may include /opt/Advantech/WebAccess/VPN, C:\Program Files\Advantech\WebAccess\VPN, or check the system's service list for WebAccess/VPN processes.Affected if The product is present on the system.
-
Determine installed WebAccess/VPN versionQuery the installed version through the application's interface, check version files in the installation directory, or use the command line tool if available (such as 'vpnserver version' or checking the About section in the web interface). Compare the version number to the affected range: versions before 1.1.5 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is less than 1.1.5.
-
Verify the web server component is runningCheck if the WebAccess/VPN web service is active. On Linux, run 'ps aux | grep -i webaccess' or 'systemctl status webaccess-vpn'. On Windows, check the service status in Services.msc or use 'sc query WebAccessVPN'.Affected if The web server process is running and accessible over the network.
-
Check if authentication is required for the vulnerable endpointAttempt to access the AjaxStandaloneVpnClientsController.ajaxDownloadRoadWarriorConfigFileAction() endpoint without credentials, or review the application's authentication configuration to confirm whether network administrator credentials are enforced.Affected if The endpoint accepts requests without requiring valid administrator authentication (or if default/weak credentials are in use).
The environment is affected if Advantech WebAccess/VPN is installed with a version before 1.1.5 and the web interface is accessible, as an authenticated administrator could exploit the path traversal to read arbitrary files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.5
Upgrade to WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5 or later which contains the patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement strict input validation and path sanitization on the affected function to restrict file access to expected paths only.
WebAccess/VPN 1.1.5
- Back up the current WebAccess/VPN configuration and any custom settings before proceeding with the upgrade.
- Obtain the WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5 from the official Advantech source (icr.advantech.com or authorized distribution channels).
- Follow Advantech's standard upgrade procedure for WebAccess/VPN, typically involving stopping the service, replacing application files, and restarting the service.
- After upgrading, verify that the AjaxStandaloneVpnClientsController.ajaxDownloadRoadWarriorConfigFileAction() endpoint no longer accepts absolute path arguments and functions normally.
- Confirm the installation by checking the WebAccess/VPN version displayed in the administration interface shows 1.1.5 or later.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34238 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34238 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data