CVE-2025-34420
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain an unsafe DLL loading vulnerability that can lead to local arbitrary code execution. The MailEnable administrative executable attempts to load MEAIAM.DLL from its installation directory without sufficient integrity validation or a secure search order. A local attacker with write access to that directory can plant a malicious MEAIAM.DLL, which is then loaded on execution, resulting in attacker-controlled code running with the privileges of the process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMailEnable versions before 10.54 contain an unsafe DLL loading vulnerability where the administrative executable attempts to load MEAIAM.DLL from its installation directory without proper integrity checks or secure search order. A local attacker with write access to the installation directory can plant a malicious DLL that gets loaded upon execution, resulting in arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the admin process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.54CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check MailEnable versionOpen Windows Registry and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\MailEnable\InstallLevel or check the 'About' dialog in MailEnable Administrator console. Alternatively, check the file version of MEAdmin.exe in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version is lower than 10.54 (e.g., 10.53, 10.52, earlier versions).
-
Locate MailEnable installation directoryCheck the default path C:\Program Files\MailEnable or look at the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\MailEnable\MailEnable's 'Install Directory' value.Affected if The installation directory is found and contains MailEnable executables.
-
Verify MEAIAM.DLL presenceCheck if MEAIAM.DLL exists in the MailEnable installation directory using File Explorer or command: dir "C:\Program Files\MailEnable\MEAIAM.DLL"Affected if The file MEAIAM.DLL exists in the installation directory, meaning the vulnerable DLL loading attempt could occur.
-
Inspect directory permissionsRight-click the MailEnable installation folder, go to Properties > Security, and review which users and groups have Write or Modify permissions. Use icacls command: icacls "C:\Program Files\MailEnable"Affected if Non-administrative users or groups (such as Users, IIS_IUSRS, or authenticated users) have Write or Modify permissions on the installation directory, allowing DLL planting.
A user is affected if MailEnable version is below 10.54 AND non-privileged accounts have write access to the MailEnable installation directory where MEAIAM.DLL gets loaded.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.54
Update MailEnable to version 10.54 or later. Additionally, restrict filesystem write permissions on the MailEnable installation directory to prevent unauthorized DLL planting by non-privileged users.
10.54
- Backup the current MailEnable installation, configuration, and data directories before proceeding with the upgrade
- Stop all MailEnable services (MailEnable Service Manager or via Windows Services)
- Download MailEnable version 10.54 or later from the official MailEnable download page at mailenable.com
- Run the MailEnable upgrade installer with administrator privileges
- Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
- Restart all MailEnable services after the upgrade completes
- Verify that the administrative interface loads correctly and the version shows 10.54 or later
- Confirm that MEAIAM.DLL is loaded from the correct system directory and not from a user-writable location
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34420 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34420 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data