CVE-2025-34422
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain an unsafe DLL loading vulnerability that can lead to local arbitrary code execution. The MailEnable administrative executable attempts to load MEAIPC.DLL from its installation directory without sufficient integrity validation or a secure search order. A local attacker with write access to that directory can plant a malicious MEAIPC.DLL, which is then loaded on execution, resulting in attacker-controlled code running with the privileges of the process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMailEnable versions before 10.54 suffer from an unsafe DLL loading vulnerability where the administrative executable attempts to load MEAIPC.DLL from its installation directory without validating the DLL's integrity or using a secure search order. A local attacker with write access to the MailEnable installation directory can place a malicious MEAIPC.DLL that gets loaded when the admin tool runs, executing attacker-controlled code with the privileges of the administrative process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.54CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MailEnable installation path and versionLocate the MailEnable installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\MailEnable or C:\Program Files (x86)\MailEnable) and check the version of MEADMIN.exe or the main executable. Use 'dir' or Windows Explorer to find version information in file properties, or check the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\MailEnable\Installed-Version if available.Affected if The installed version number is less than 10.54 (e.g., 10.53, 10.50, etc.)
-
Verify MEAIPC.DLL exists in installation directoryCheck if MEAIPC.DLL file is present in the MailEnable installation directory using 'dir C:\Path\To\MailEnable\MEAIPC.DLL' or File Explorer.Affected if MEAIPC.DLL exists in the MailEnable installation folder (the vulnerable DLL that gets loaded by the admin tool)
-
Check write permissions on MailEnable directoryUse icacls or right-click the MailEnable installation folder > Properties > Security to review write permissions. Run 'icacls "C:\Program Files\MailEnable"' to list permissions for users and groups.Affected if Non-administrator or untrusted users have Write or Write+Execute permissions to the MailEnable installation directory, allowing them to replace MEAIPC.DLL
You are affected if MailEnable version is below 10.54 AND the installation directory is writable by untrusted users, enabling a local attacker to place a malicious MEAIPC.DLL that executes when the admin tool runs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.54
Upgrade to MailEnable version 10.54 or later to obtain the vendor patch. As a compensating control, restrict write access to the MailEnable installation directory to only trusted administrators until the patch is applied.
10.54
- 1. Back up the current MailEnable installation and configuration data before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 2. Download MailEnable version 10.54 (or the latest stable version) from the official MailEnable website (www.mailenable.com).
- 3. Run the MailEnable installer and follow the upgrade prompts to update the installation to version 10.54.
- 4. After installation completes, verify that the version is correctly reported as 10.54 or higher by checking the MailEnable administrative interface or installed program information.
- 5. Restart the MailEnable services to ensure the new executable and DLLs are properly loaded.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34422 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34422 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data