CVE-2025-34515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIlevia EVE X1 Server firmware versions ≤ 4.7.18.0.eden contain an execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability in sync_project.sh that allows an attacker to escalate privileges to root. Ilevia has declined to service this vulnerability, and recommends that customers not expose port 8080 to the internet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Ilevia EVE X1 Server firmware contains a script (sync_project.sh) that executes with elevated privileges beyond what is necessary for its function. This allows a local attacker to escalate privileges from their current user level to root, achieving full system control. The vulnerability affects firmware versions 4.7.18.0 and below.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.7.18.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify firmware versionAccess the device administrative interface or check system information to retrieve the installed firmware version. This is typically found in Settings > System > About or similar menu path.Affected if The firmware version is 4.7.18.0 or lower
-
Locate the sync_project.sh scriptSearch for the sync_project.sh file on the filesystem. Common paths may include /usr/local/bin/, /opt/, or /scripts/. Use the command: find / -name sync_project.sh 2>/dev/nullAffected if The script exists on the system and runs with elevated privileges
-
Check script file permissions and ownershipRun ls -la on the sync_project.sh file to examine ownership (whether it is owned by root) and permissions (especially if it has the setuid bit or runs with sudo).Affected if The script is owned by root and has elevated execution permissions
-
Verify if the script executes as rootInspect the script contents or observe its execution context to determine if it runs commands as the root user or with sudo privileges.Affected if The script executes with root-level privileges without proper constraint
-
Check network exposure of port 8080Use netstat or ss to check if port 8080 is listening and exposed: netstat -tuln | grep 8080 or ss -tuln | grep 8080. Also verify firewall rules.Affected if Port 8080 is externally accessible, enabling remote authenticated attackers to reach the vulnerable script
You are affected if your firmware version is 4.7.18.0 or below AND the sync_project.sh script exists with elevated privileges and is accessible via port 8080 or locally.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince the vendor has declined to provide a patch, organizations should immediately restrict network access to port 8080, implement network segmentation to prevent unauthorized local access, and consider compensating controls such as application whitelisting or monitoring for suspicious script execution.
- Review all network firewall rules and configurations for systems running Eve X1 Server Firmware
- Identify any exposure of port 8080 to untrusted/external networks
- Configure firewall rules to block inbound traffic on port 8080 from external/untrusted sources
- If remote administrative access to port 8080 is required, implement VPN connectivity or restrict access to trusted IP addresses only
- Verify that port 8080 is no longer directly accessible from the internet
- Document and monitor any attempts to access port 8080 from external addresses
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data