CVE-2025-3486
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAllegra isZipEntryValide Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the isZipEntryValide method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of LOCAL SERVICE. Was ZDI-CAN-25730.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDirectory traversal vulnerability in the isZipEntryValide method of Allegra allows authenticated attackers to manipulate file paths using '../' sequences to access arbitrary directories, leading to remote code execution in the context of LOCAL SERVICE due to lack of proper validation of user-supplied paths prior to file operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Allegra installation and versionCheck for Allegra installation directories (commonly in /opt/allegra, C:\Program Files\Allegra, or similar). Look for version file or check the application binary/version info. Compare the installed version number to the affected range: versions prior to 8.1.2 are vulnerable.Affected if Allegra is installed and version is below 8.1.2
-
Locate isZipEntryValide method usageSearch application source code, libraries, or JAR files for references to 'isZipEntryValide' or 'isZipEntryValid'. Check if the method is invoked during zip file processing operations.Affected if The isZipEntryValide method exists in the installed version and is callable by authenticated users
-
Verify authenticated user access existsReview user authentication configuration and,确认是否存在可以使用zip上传/处理功能的已认证用户账户。检查用户权限级别。Affected if Authenticated users can access features that invoke the vulnerable method (zip file upload, import, or processing)
-
Check for directory traversal in file operationsInspect application logs, web server logs, or file access audit logs for patterns containing '../' or absolute path sequences in zip entry names. Look for unusual file read/write attempts.Affected if Logs show zip entries with '../' sequences or access to files outside expected directories
A user is affected if Allegra version is below 8.1.2, the isZipEntryValide method is in use, and authenticated users can trigger zip file processing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.2
Apply vendor patch when available; implement strict path validation including path canonicalization, allowlist-based directory validation, and filtering of '../' sequences in the isZipEntryValide method.
Allegra 8.1.2
- Identify the current Allegra installation version
- Download Allegra version 8.1.2 or later from the official vendor
- Backup the current Allegra configuration and database
- Stop the Allegra service
- Install the updated Allegra version 8.1.2
- Verify the isZipEntryValide method now properly validates user-supplied paths
- Start the Allegra service
- Confirm the application functions normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3486 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3486 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data