CVE-2025-6216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAllegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application. Was ZDI-CAN-27104.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in Allegra's password recovery mechanism where password reset tokens are generated using a predictable value rather than cryptographically secure randomness. This allows remote attackers to forge or guess valid password reset tokens and bypass authentication entirely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.5.2.70>= 8.0.0, < 8.1.24CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Allegra versionLocate the Allegra installation directory and check the version file or use the application's admin interface to view version information. Common locations include a version file in the installation root or the 'About' section in the admin panel.Affected if The installed version falls within 7.0.0 to 7.5.2.70 (exclusive of 7.5.2.70) or 8.0.0 to 8.1.24 (exclusive of 8.1.24).
-
Confirm password reset feature is enabledAccess the application's authentication configuration or admin settings to verify whether the 'Forgot Password' or password reset functionality is enabled and accessible to users.Affected if Password reset functionality is enabled and publicly accessible to unauthenticated users.
-
Check application exposureDetermine if the Allegra web interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet, as this is a remote authentication bypass vulnerability.Affected if The Allegra instance is accessible from untrusted networks or the public internet without additional authentication barriers.
-
Review authentication logs for anomaliesExamine server and application logs for unusual password reset requests, particularly multiple reset attempts from single IP addresses or patterns suggesting token guessing.Affected if Logs show unusual patterns in password reset requests such as high volume from specific sources or sequential token generation attempts.
You are affected if Allegra is running a version within 7.0.0 to 7.5.2.70 or 8.0.0 to 8.1.24 AND the password reset feature is enabled and accessible to attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.2.708.1.24
Implement cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generation (CSPRNG) for password reset tokens with sufficient entropy, add rate limiting on password reset requests, and invalidate any existing predictable tokens.
Allegra version 7.5.2.70+ (for 7.x branch) or 8.1.24+ (for 8.x branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Allegra version by checking the application's about page or system information
- 2. If running version 7.0.0 through 7.5.2.69, plan upgrade to version 7.5.2.70 or later
- 3. If running version 8.0.0 through 8.1.23, plan upgrade to version 8.1.24 or later
- 4. Create a complete backup of the Allegra database and configuration files before proceeding
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official vendor (alltena.com) or authorized distribution channel
- 6. Follow vendor-provided upgrade instructions to install the new version
- 7. After upgrade, verify the application is running the fixed version
- 8. Test the password recovery functionality to confirm the token generation now uses unpredictable values
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data