Security Verify GovernanceApplication · Ibm

CVE-2025-36003

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Verify Governance Identity Manager 10.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when detailed technical error messages are returned. This information could be used in further attacks against the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Security Verify Governance Identity Manager 10.0.2 returns detailed technical error messages to users, allowing remote attackers to potentially obtain sensitive system information such as file paths, configuration details, or internal architecture that could aid in further exploitation.

MitigationConfigure the application to display generic error messages in production and suppress detailed stack traces or technical information. Ensure debug/error modes are disabled and custom error handlers return sanitized, user-friendly messages.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Verify GovernanceApplication
Affected:= 10.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if IBM Security Verify Governance Identity Manager is installed
    Check for the installation directory (commonly at /opt/ibm/isvg or C:\Program Files\ibm\isvg on Windows) or look for the ISVG service/process running on the system.
    Affected if The product is installed on the system
  2. Confirm the installed version is 10.0.2
    Check the version file or use the product's administrative console to view the installed version. Common locations: version.txt in the installation directory, or the 'About' section in the admin UI.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.0.2
  3. Determine if custom error handlers are configured
    Inspect the web.xml or error-page configuration files in the application deployment (typically under WEB-INF/web.xml or in the application server configuration). Look for <error-page> entries.
    Affected if No custom error handlers are defined or the handlers return stack traces
  4. Check if debug mode is enabled
    Review the application configuration files (such as fimConfig.xml, logger.properties, or the IBM Security Verify admin configuration) for debug=true or similar debug-enabling settings.
    Affected if Debug mode or verbose error reporting is enabled in the configuration

A user is affected if IBM Security Verify Governance Identity Manager version 10.0.2 is installed with debug/error modes enabled or without custom sanitized error handlers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Configure the application to display generic error messages in production and suppress detailed stack traces or technical information. Ensure debug/error modes are disabled and custom error handlers return sanitized, user-friendly messages.

Fix this in Security Verify Governance Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36003 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data